Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Release of tax returns as a requirement [View all]WillowTree
(5,350 posts)33. Actually, it may be OK for the individual states to require tax returns to be on the ballot.
Remember, we don't have a countrywide presidential election, we have 50 statewide elections and the states can run them as they see fit so long as none of their requirements are in conflict with the Constitution. So, technically, I think state-by-state requirements for tax info may fly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wasn't California going to pass a bill to make this a ballot access requirement?
LonePirate
Jan 2017
#2
I think you're on the right track and they should be considered as part of the financial disclosures
Arkansas Granny
Jan 2017
#3
What I think is irrelevant; if it's not in the Constitution it doesn't matter.
brooklynite
Jan 2017
#6
But the KGOP is all about state's rights. If states pass laws barring anyone from being on the
OregonBlue
Jan 2017
#7
The fact that you like to make up your own version of the law doesn't make it real law.
onenote
Jan 2017
#26
The bounds of the Constitution have been expanded since Hamilton proposed a national bank.
eniwetok
Jan 2017
#43
Actually, it may be OK for the individual states to require tax returns to be on the ballot.
WillowTree
Jan 2017
#33
I agree with half your statement. The other half is a legal and logical fallacy.
LanternWaste
Jan 2017
#34
All candidates need to be vetted in regards to money owed, and what, countries/mobsters
sarcasmo
Jan 2017
#40