Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to WillowTree (Reply #33)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

At the very least. Yes. n/t Guilded Lilly Jan 2017 #1
Wasn't California going to pass a bill to make this a ballot access requirement? LonePirate Jan 2017 #2
States are going to get creative now- NY w tuition, Cali w this law.. bettyellen Jan 2017 #10
Yes and there is a similar bill being pursued here in Massachusetts as well mythology Jan 2017 #27
I think you're on the right track and they should be considered as part of the financial disclosures Arkansas Granny Jan 2017 #3
It would act as a pre-filter SHRED Jan 2017 #4
Agree mountain grammy Jan 2017 #5
What I think is irrelevant; if it's not in the Constitution it doesn't matter. brooklynite Jan 2017 #6
But the KGOP is all about state's rights. If states pass laws barring anyone from being on the OregonBlue Jan 2017 #7
ahh..but income tax wasn't levied when the Constitution was drafted. sdfernando Jan 2017 #13
OF COURSE it's in the Constitution eniwetok Jan 2017 #19
And would be shot down unanimously by SCOTUS Uggwearingdad Jan 2017 #20
specifically what crap? eniwetok Jan 2017 #21
Imposing qualifications beyond those in the Constitution is unconstitutional onenote Jan 2017 #22
Well played... Uggwearingdad Jan 2017 #23
you're not defending your own argument. eniwetok Jan 2017 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #30
that decision was about state term limits for Congress eniwetok Jan 2017 #24
The fact that you like to make up your own version of the law doesn't make it real law. onenote Jan 2017 #26
Are you running from your own post? eniwetok Jan 2017 #28
No. I'm not sure what would remotely make you think so. onenote Jan 2017 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #31
Yes, I've been part of those discussions as well. onenote Jan 2017 #32
because eniwetok Jan 2017 #38
Again, you're wrong. onenote Jan 2017 #41
we're never going to agree eniwetok Jan 2017 #42
The bounds of the Constitution have been expanded since Hamilton proposed a national bank. eniwetok Jan 2017 #43
Actually, it may be OK for the individual states to require tax returns to be on the ballot. WillowTree Jan 2017 #33
No it wouldn't onenote Jan 2017 #35
Hmmmmm.........of course you're right. WillowTree Jan 2017 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #36
I agree with half your statement. The other half is a legal and logical fallacy. LanternWaste Jan 2017 #34
Absolutely. BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #8
Sad that it should have to be a requirement ToxMarz Jan 2017 #9
And a world geography exam, US Constitution exam, They_Live Jan 2017 #11
How would you get those currently elected to vote TNNurse Jan 2017 #12
You'd have to do what they always do, exempt hughee99 Jan 2017 #16
Tax returns a must bdamomma Jan 2017 #14
Absolutely n/t TicaTwo Jan 2017 #15
It's a good idea, but will require legislation. MineralMan Jan 2017 #17
good idea ...... never get to the floor Angry Dragon Jan 2017 #18
AGREE 100% TrekLuver Jan 2017 #39
All candidates need to be vetted in regards to money owed, and what, countries/mobsters sarcasmo Jan 2017 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Release of tax returns as...»Reply #36