Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Killer Is Proud American Gun Owner [View all]guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)97. More surveys about defensive use?
Given the absence of actual evidence, I suppose your surveys are the best you can do.
Again, a nice repetition of NRA talking points but that is no comfort to the 30,000 gun death victims each year.
Perhaps the CDC could investigate gun violence and the link to more shootings and the proliferation of guns in public? Well no. Actually, courtesy of the NRA, it is illegal for the CDC to do so.
Do not believe me?
http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-gun-research-funding-20160614-snap-story.html
After you do your better things, perhaps you should read a bit of the above link and do a bit more research. Actual facts would serve you better than insulting language.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just like you can give us no assurance any vehicle operator isn't the next Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel
Marengo
Jan 2017
#20
Collective indictments, such as you articulated in post #1, are a right wing characteristic.
Marengo
Jan 2017
#26
The Party platform condemns every American gun owner as desiring to be mass killer?
Marengo
Jan 2017
#52
How is a mass killer in a truck a "false equivalency" to a mass killer with a gun?
EX500rider
Jan 2017
#34
No I do not, I think trucks are more dangerous in the hands of a mass killer.
EX500rider
Jan 2017
#44
And yet a vehicle, used as a weapon, killed 86 in a single event. Fairly effective for something...
Marengo
Jan 2017
#54
Design intent is irrelevant from a public safety perspective. Now that has been established that...
Marengo
Jan 2017
#104
Again, design intent is the only relevant issue from a public safety perspective.
guillaumeb
Jan 2017
#109
And yet 4 more were just killed by something not designed as a weapon being used as a weapon.
Marengo
Jan 2017
#115
How about answering my question? What am I to infer from your refusal to do so?
Marengo
Jan 2017
#120
And now you may post a link to where I've said such a thing, or retract. If you have the integrity.
Marengo
Jan 2017
#122
You have neither apparently. I'll ask you again for a link to where I have indicated I am...
Marengo
Jan 2017
#124
Not accepting that, it's too specific and cannot be reasonable deduced from the content of my...
Marengo
Jan 2017
#126
No, it does not for the reason I articulated. There is no probability that such a position can be...
Marengo
Jan 2017
#128
My nephew did 5 tours in Iraq, my son did one in Afganistan and one in Kuwait.
oneshooter
Jan 2017
#89
Gunners stick a gun on their hip for it's intimidation value, well and as a compensator.
Hoyt
Jan 2017
#113
Oh, FFS. How the fuck am I supposed to determine who is responsible and who
madinmaryland
Jan 2017
#99
It's not up to you to 'determine' anything- if it's legal, MYOB. If not, leave and call 911
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2017
#108
It's my understanding that those Americans with guns were in well regulated military units.
Crunchy Frog
Jan 2017
#36
I'm sure they are, but I doubt that their being gun owners in civilian life
Crunchy Frog
Jan 2017
#42
Simply Google: 'ISIS one finger salute pictures' - and see if anything looks familiar.
jonno99
Jan 2017
#66
Not all gun owners are bad people, obviously, but I wish we had stricter gun regulations...
Buckeye_Democrat
Jan 2017
#76