Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
70. That is good and decent, Rufus, but you know many of the most forceful defenders
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:24 PM
Jun 2012

where posting "cut them loose" threads at the time, they were fine with rolling over on Sherod, they were fine with leaving Van Jones hanging, they were uniformly leading the dump Weiner bandwagon, are always talking of ways to placate the TeaPubliKlans and bogus bipartisanship and I do find it beyond strange that all the sudden we hear about some gumption just in time to circle the wagons for a Turd Way part of the problem when we couldn't even be having the conversation if he had went after the criminals that started this shit instead of continuing it to prosecute the failed drug war.

I also notice that there few, if any, claims of actual innocence and instead the excuse that Bush started it which is hollow and stupid considering Democrats were elected to clean up the mess not keep it going. Now we have Democrats on here minimizing deaths, pretending the scheme is kosher, and just generally not giving a fuck about anything but the rule of law standing on the disgusting but predictable TeaPubliKlan hypocrisy on the matter, many of the same folks always pressing for policy assimilation with the fucking crooks.

This is self inflicted to my mind, this behavior and hypocrisy are not only expected but forewarned which is why you prosecute and reverse policy.

I'm also not going to spend any time defending this level of not just amoral criminality but incompetence. If someone would OK a scheme like this they are so brain dead as not to be trusted with any level of stewardship, particularly with the benefit of hindsight. This had ALREADY been a criminal BushCo. FAIL so why would anyone worth a cup of cold piss decide to go with an encore? Worse yet, to persecute the fucking drug war????

Oh come on! The policy is totally indefensible, the purpose is failed and stupid, and the actions seriously dangerous and completely past goofy.

I don't get any of the argument here. This is the kind of shit we are supposed to "stand with"? Not me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If this is handled right, it could seriously embarrass the GOP and Issa. tabatha Jun 2012 #1
there is nothing on Earth that apparently embarrasses Issa Johonny Jun 2012 #2
Not a good idea. bvar22 Jun 2012 #3
Bullshit! n/t ProSense Jun 2012 #4
Bullshit? Really? bvar22 Jun 2012 #7
Yes, bullshit ProSense Jun 2012 #8
So this is what's left when you strip away whatchamacallit Jun 2012 #19
Tags: ProSense Jun 2012 #22
Ha, look who's talking! whatchamacallit Jun 2012 #24
Wow ProSense Jun 2012 #26
You're the only one looking forward to that whatchamacallit Jun 2012 #30
Yeah, ProSense Jun 2012 #33
Why so touchy lately? girl gone mad Jun 2012 #62
Oh, I Agree, bvar22 Jun 2012 #20
Again ProSense Jun 2012 #21
Now THAT is odd. bvar22 Jun 2012 #29
What? ProSense Jun 2012 #31
Agreed. nt AverageJoe90 Jun 2012 #56
We need to fight every battle. I am sick of keeping powder dry. nm rhett o rick Jun 2012 #59
Fight every battle? bvar22 Jun 2012 #67
Holder was appointed by the Pres. He is doing what the president wants. rhett o rick Jun 2012 #68
Why didn't they 'fuck Issa' when he put forward his egregious and unconstitutional bill of attainder sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #27
Yes, ProSense Jun 2012 #35
Wow, you have such a narrow focus that you totally missed the point. rhett o rick Jun 2012 #72
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #9
Well don't hold back.. tell us how you *really* feel! Ghost in the Machine Jun 2012 #11
I am soooo pissed off at these purity posts rufus dog Jun 2012 #13
They really are absurd. Holder is quietly kucking ass just Solomon Jun 2012 #18
Yeah, fuck that purity shit! I want a lyin-ass tainted government! whatchamacallit Jun 2012 #36
Then go after ISSA (Breitbart Jr) emulatorloo Jun 2012 #54
Issa's a douche spillway whatchamacallit Jun 2012 #64
Not just cut loose Dokkie Jun 2012 #23
And if Obama were in the mood to appease Republicans, wouldn't he simply JDPriestly Jun 2012 #65
Yep...Just Play Right Into Issa Hands... KharmaTrain Jun 2012 #5
I am certainly not a Holder fan, but now isnt the time to throw him under the bus. rhett o rick Jun 2012 #57
Listen to the first hour of Randi Rhodes show on 06/20/2012. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #63
Watch the first segment from yesterday's Jon Stewart Daily Show. bvar22 Jun 2012 #71
The Repubs believe Obama is an easy mark... kentuck Jun 2012 #6
Obama becomes an easy mark with the help of Democrats who are fucking ignorant rufus dog Jun 2012 #10
I hope you said the same about ACORN and all the other under the bus gang. TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #14
No. Fuck Issa! n/t ProSense Jun 2012 #15
Yup, fuck him with a rusty dumpster but fuck Holder stands too. TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #47
In fact I did rufus dog Jun 2012 #16
That is good and decent, Rufus, but you know many of the most forceful defenders TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #70
Rule of Law = 'purity' sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #46
"Obama becomes an easy mark with the help of Democrats who are fucking ignorant" bvar22 Jun 2012 #51
I detest Holder Aerows Jun 2012 #12
+1 nt TBF Jun 2012 #17
Fine! Throw it back in Issa's lap! bvar22 Jun 2012 #32
Can't stand Holder Aerows Jun 2012 #34
The problem with THAT strategy... bvar22 Jun 2012 #52
Isn't re-electing Obama more important than Holder surviving? Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #25
You should ProSense Jun 2012 #28
So he says now. This is just the first round of volleys RZM Jun 2012 #37
After Aerows Jun 2012 #39
Right now I would slightly lean towards after too. But if this goes on long enough . . . RZM Jun 2012 #40
Dump him now. Issue goes away. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #41
Does that outweigh the weakness it shows? I don't know. I'll leave that to the strategists RZM Jun 2012 #42
This one actually ProSense Jun 2012 #43
OK. I'll concede that reasonable people can differ on this. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #44
I only wish ProSense Jun 2012 #45
So this is where Dems draw a line in the sand? girl gone mad Jun 2012 #66
You GO, girl gone mad!!! bvar22 Jun 2012 #69
I can't agree with that. A resignation would be a kind of admission of guilt. Marr Jun 2012 #75
Is this a joke? BklnDem75 Jun 2012 #76
I can't stand Holder Aerows Jun 2012 #38
Hey, I don't know if you knew... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #73
Two weeks until the President refers to Holder a "over-zealous in his defense of liberty" slackmaster Jun 2012 #48
It's OK when our side does it!!! Odin2005 Jun 2012 #49
Jon Stewart summed up my feelings exactly about this growing embarrassment... bvar22 Jun 2012 #50
like it or not, the admin now owns this issue frylock Jun 2012 #53
And the issue is ISSA claims this is Obama's secret plot to take away your guns! emulatorloo Jun 2012 #55
+1 Spot on. n/t FSogol Jun 2012 #58
Issa is a jerk. I am embarrassed to say... YvonneCa Jun 2012 #60
yes, issa is a lying jerk.. frylock Jun 2012 #61
If the White House had stood by Shirley Sherrod, Van Jones, ACORN, Unions, Marr Jun 2012 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Stands By Hol...»Reply #70