General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House Stands By Holder On Fast And Furious [View all]TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)where posting "cut them loose" threads at the time, they were fine with rolling over on Sherod, they were fine with leaving Van Jones hanging, they were uniformly leading the dump Weiner bandwagon, are always talking of ways to placate the TeaPubliKlans and bogus bipartisanship and I do find it beyond strange that all the sudden we hear about some gumption just in time to circle the wagons for a Turd Way part of the problem when we couldn't even be having the conversation if he had went after the criminals that started this shit instead of continuing it to prosecute the failed drug war.
I also notice that there few, if any, claims of actual innocence and instead the excuse that Bush started it which is hollow and stupid considering Democrats were elected to clean up the mess not keep it going. Now we have Democrats on here minimizing deaths, pretending the scheme is kosher, and just generally not giving a fuck about anything but the rule of law standing on the disgusting but predictable TeaPubliKlan hypocrisy on the matter, many of the same folks always pressing for policy assimilation with the fucking crooks.
This is self inflicted to my mind, this behavior and hypocrisy are not only expected but forewarned which is why you prosecute and reverse policy.
I'm also not going to spend any time defending this level of not just amoral criminality but incompetence. If someone would OK a scheme like this they are so brain dead as not to be trusted with any level of stewardship, particularly with the benefit of hindsight. This had ALREADY been a criminal BushCo. FAIL so why would anyone worth a cup of cold piss decide to go with an encore? Worse yet, to persecute the fucking drug war????
Oh come on! The policy is totally indefensible, the purpose is failed and stupid, and the actions seriously dangerous and completely past goofy.
I don't get any of the argument here. This is the kind of shit we are supposed to "stand with"? Not me.