Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Krugman's Harshest Post Yet [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)59. The reference may be broken since that's a handout, here's the proper cite:
Globalization has reduced the wages of unskilled workers for at least three reasons. First, the steady growth in U.S. trade deficits over the past two decades has eliminated millions of manufacturing jobs and job opportunities in this country. Most displaced workers find jobs in other sectors where wages are much lower, which in turn leads to lower average wages for all U.S. workers. Recent surveys have shown that, even when displaced workers are able to find new jobs in the U.S., they face a reduction in wages, with earnings declining by an average of over 13% (Mishel et al. 2001, 24). These displaced workers new jobs are likely to be in the service industry, the source of 99% of net new jobs created in the United States since 1989, and a sector in which average compensation is only 77% of the manufacturing sectors average (Mishel et al. 2001, 169). This competition also extends to export sectors, where pressures to cut product prices are often intense.
From here: http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/NAFTA@7/nafta-at-7.pdf
This is also of note: http://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp147/
Hardly fucking "modest." Even if I have a shit grasp of the English language I know what "modest" means.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps the harshest, but he still stopped short of calling it what it is.
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#2
Third Way Manny **undoubtedly** loved Paul Krugman's book "Pop Internationalism"
Romulox
Jun 2012
#14
Um, Third Way? Krugman doesn't limit his argument to NAFTA. The whole book is a paean to "free
Romulox
Jun 2012
#23
PS: Is it "Third Way Manny" or just "Manny" who is speaking in favor of NAFTA, here?
Romulox
Jun 2012
#24
"NAFTA caused a modest drop in the incomes low-skilled-workers" - Manny, 2012
joshcryer
Jun 2012
#46
Right! That dang Krugman aims to destroy our carefully crafted stupor of denial.
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#20
It's obvious that Krugman thinks we are going over a cliff. If so, I'm worried.
CTyankee
Jun 2012
#7
Obama won't get a filibuster-proof majority with folks like you doing Karl Rove's work for him.
SunSeeker
Jun 2012
#62
"centrists" are center right, have been since the nineties (at least), where have you been? Social
Dragonfli
Jun 2012
#65
I may not vote at all, I only will vote for right wing OPPOSITION (I will not vote FOR RW policy)
Dragonfli
Jun 2012
#67
By not voting (and trashing Obama) you are serving the Repukes--and your own destruction.
SunSeeker
Jun 2012
#68
He's right, Grand Nagus Greenspan was a double agent for the dumbass Austrian Economics crackpots.
TrollBuster9090
Jun 2012
#49