Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scribble

(189 posts)
20. Rachel is a national treasure ...
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 04:27 AM
Jun 2012

but there are some conversational places she can not go without being bushwhacked.

She does not handle herself very well when confronted by someone who is reasoning in bad faith. She keeps trying to be reasonable, and the other person just shouts her down with soundbites. It's easy to troll Rachel.

While I think rachel won the debate tonight on points, I know better. This wasn't a debate that was scored in points: It was scored in soundbites. To most of the audience she appeared weak, because she didn't throw a sound bite at that Libertarian shill that made him pause.

She needed to make him pause for just a third of a second. That would have been the give-away for the audience. It would have given her the opening to take charge of the dialog and pose a quotable, unanswerable question back to the ShillMaster sitting in the end seat.

... but like I said; I've never seen her do it as a guest on another host's show.

sc

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Anyone watching Rachel on Bill Maher [View all] One of the 99 Jun 2012 OP
Nick Gillespie pinboy3niner Jun 2012 #1
Rachel really took offense at the guy who suggested she was a hack aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #3
He seemed to be gunning for her from the beginning pinboy3niner Jun 2012 #6
Only a complete moron would go after Rachael in public. He apparently didn't do his homework because Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #22
In case you hadn't noticed ... GeorgeGist Jun 2012 #23
horrible show tonight. Even new rules seemed bad. GusFring Jun 2012 #2
Why didn't she answer a simple question rightwinger77 Jun 2012 #4
Why doesn't Romney state what his opinion of Romneycare is? aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #5
Oh, SNAP! pinboy3niner Jun 2012 #7
Don't look to me to defend Romney. rightwinger77 Jun 2012 #8
BTW, your screen name....usually when "rightwingers" join us, they are incognito. nt Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #13
I love the back and forth. rightwinger77 Jun 2012 #15
Are you a right winger? Cali_Democrat Jun 2012 #18
Make sure you read the TOS. nt MADem Jun 2012 #19
+ 1,000,000,000. Chorophyll Jun 2012 #14
Welcome. Love Rachael and the guy was EmeraldCityGrl Jun 2012 #9
10 dimensional chess maybe ;) rightwinger77 Jun 2012 #12
Rachel is a national treasure ... scribble Jun 2012 #20
Spot On!! B Calm Jun 2012 #21
Careful With Those Wings... KharmaTrain Jun 2012 #10
first post? It says "2".but will let you slide. I really don't think Romney wants people to Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #11
Really? Bummer abelenkpe Jun 2012 #16
I only saw new rules... lame54 Jun 2012 #24
Spam deleted by OKNancy (MIR Team) nurasia Jun 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone watching Rachel on...»Reply #20