Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,121 posts)
7. nobody "preserves their legacy" by violating laws and policies for personal gain.
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 11:03 AM
Jan 2017

that's called "achieving notoriety".

i agree that there was that backdrop at fbi, that there were plenty on the rabid right both inside and outside the fbi that were pissed at him for dropping the case against hillary.

but what he did only redeems him in the eyes of people who put hyper-partisanship way, way, way over law, principle, ethics, justice, etc. his last-minute move hurt hillary politically but did nothing to advance any sense of justice in the case against her, and it swayed an election affecting the entire country for the sake of balancing the scales against a single target.


no. he did it because he knew that what he had was gold, that it was worth a ton of money and celebrity for him within the republican community.

so, yeah, maybe he was motivated by losing his place in the pantheon of fbi legends, but he wasn't trying to redeem himself in that area. he was carving out for himself a different legacy, in a community that only cares about partisan crap.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On a scale of 1-10 how li...»Reply #7