Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Geoff R. Casavant

(2,381 posts)
4. I will echo and add to your comments.
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 12:42 PM
Dec 2011

Cases involving children, such as child sex crimes but also including other things like custody disputes, generally have unique procedural and evidentiary rules, and an attorney who is experienced in these rules is generally more effective than one who doesn't know the particular ins and outs.

Add to that the additional expertise required to elicit testimony or cross-examine a child, who most likely is scared to be on the stand in the first place. A good attorney needs to know how to get the required testimony without antagonizing the child or coming off as the "bad guy." That kind of finesse takes years to develop.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WI Gov Walker Appoints Ju...»Reply #4