Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
12. You are highlighting the exact problem with it.
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 05:37 PM
Jan 2017
They need to be provided with the same opportunity to die on the basis of their financial status as the people they represent.


That's exactly the problem I am pointing out: they won't have the same opportunity. This only impacts those who are not wealthy, and politics already heavily favors those who are personally wealthy. This is why virtually all of the members of Congress are already personally rich. Taking away benefits does not hurt them because they did not need those benefits in the first place. It only harms people who are not wealthy and who are interested in becoming elected officials, meaning people who would be sympathetic to the very argument that you are making.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»State by state, we need r...»Reply #12