Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ElectoralReform

(2 posts)
32. Electoral Reform Coalition, end the two-party duopoly
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 06:34 PM
Jun 2012

You should ask for a lot with your vote!

The two-party winner-take-all electoral system is not a great idea, and everyone knows it. It's divisive, simplistic, corruptible and undemocratic.
Vote for electoral reform this election, and you will never again have to vote for the 'lesser of two evils' at the risk of 'wasting your vote' on a party that truly represents you. End the two-party duopoly!

Who is to blame for our diminishing civil rights and power to control our government? The liberals, the conservatives, the president, the previous president, the Congress, the courts, the corporations, the terrorists, the U.N., the media, the Federal reserve, big banks, and money in politics?

With so many problems, it is important to focus on the root cause, where concentrated efforts can give rise to tangible, door-opening results. I contend that the first step for everyone, whether liberal, conservative, concerned about civil rights, war, abortion, immigration, gun control or any issue, lies in our electoral system.

Our winner-take-all electoral system allows only two parties. They become massive, corruptible, and broad in their rhetoric but minimal in their differences. Around the nation, most voters view their opposition party as tyrannical and evil, while their chosen party is simply “the lesser of two evils.” They do not vote for a third party, even one closer to their political ideology, because it is viewed as a wasted vote. That is not democracy.

At worst, it's a completely corrupt and orchestrated dog and pony show, draining the citizens of their freedom and money. At best, it's simply one of the most inefficient, inept, unrepresentative and unresponsive forms of government in the modern world. Either way, it's got to go.

It is not specified in the constitution to that the USA must use a winner-take-all system for the electoral college, federal, state, or local elections. Our government at all levels could change this any time they wish. But what incentive do our two bloated parties have to support this move for democracy, when it clearly puts their political power in jeopardy? The change can come from within our governmental framework, but there is much work to be done.

I am no extremist, revolutionary, or radical free thinker. These ideas are simple, rational, and common-place. Many people, most a good deal older and wiser than I, have been making the same arguments for years. Most Americans I talk to agree that two massive parties is not working. Countless advocacy groups and think-tanks have been trying to facilitate greater democracy and freedom for years. Through Instant Run-off Voting, Choice Voting, Proportional Representation, or a variety of other different voting systems, we can have a much more representative, responsive, responsible and voter controlled government.

I will gladly help one of these groups in their endeavors, but I believe the most important thing is to unify all groups motivated for change and greater representation and focus efforts unilaterally on the most accessible, root level of all our problems: The Two-Party System.

It could be as simple as 1-2-3:
1: Spread the Word and Make your Commitment.
2: Discuss, Mobilize, and Form a Consensus on Reform Candidates
3: Vote and Keep Them Accountable
(step 4, after a more democratic electoral system is in place, vote for any candidate or party knowing that your vote has value!)


Please read more and discuss at this blog:
Twitter: @electoralreform
http://electoralreformcoalition.wordpress.com
Please sign the petition here: http://signon.org/sign/electoral-reform-coalition?source=c.url&r_by=4718607
Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ElectoralReformCoalition
Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/125823220889351/

Please read more, discuss, repost, tweet, and contact your favorite activism groups. Let them know that the road forward is together, and the future is a more democratic electoral system and a more responsible and representative government!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i consider it pragmatic barbtries Jun 2012 #1
I doubt that I would ever vote for a Republican... kentuck Jun 2012 #2
Only one republican, in my life time, would I choose over a Democrat. And he would have to be demosincebirth Jun 2012 #13
I do but nothing is ever received. mmonk Jun 2012 #3
Do I ask for anything in return for my vote? SoutherDem Jun 2012 #4
good post. nt barbtries Jun 2012 #9
Thanks, SoutherDem Jun 2012 #10
I expect the person to take the office they were elected for treestar Jun 2012 #5
I want nothing more or less than the total destruction of the GOP nt auburngrad82 Jun 2012 #6
That it be counted. GeorgeGist Jun 2012 #7
“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2012 #8
Well, I always expect a little "I Voted!" sticker when I vote. MineralMan Jun 2012 #11
Yes. I ask that the person I vote for, if elected, ... spin Jun 2012 #12
"Is asking for honesty and integrity too much?" kentuck Jun 2012 #14
Apparently I do not. Marr Jun 2012 #15
I ask for what I want. I vote for the person who I think has the highest likelihood of doing it. Orangepeel Jun 2012 #16
To be honest I have always voted for the idea that we are protecting the safety net (which I have jwirr Jun 2012 #17
all i ask for in exchange for my vote is to be pandered to a little BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #18
i ask for a left supreme court, if i get nothing else. now, i know i will get more. but, as a woman seabeyond Jun 2012 #19
Yes, I want to have lunch with the President progressoid Jun 2012 #20
Maybe over the next four years we need to re-invent our relationship with voting TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #21
My problem is... kentuck Jun 2012 #23
You know I'm no cheerleader but you are edging toward blaming the final check TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #28
Thanks for your perspective, Kentuckian.. kentuck Jun 2012 #29
No, you are right as rain about that last paragraph. It is Broadway in kRaZyToWn. TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #33
I'm voting for Obama no matter what. aikoaiko Jun 2012 #22
It's why I'm voting for Feinstein and my current representative Retrograde Jun 2012 #37
I expect steady leadership Jack Sprat Jun 2012 #24
Of course. That's the whole point of a vote. LadyHawkAZ Jun 2012 #25
Obama already made his stand on Bush Tax Cuts clear three times: In 2008, 2010 and now in 2012! Poll_Blind Jun 2012 #26
Yes, I do. Iggo Jun 2012 #27
The little "I voted" sticker. quaker bill Jun 2012 #30
No, as a good little sheep I know my role is to vote quinnox Jun 2012 #31
Electoral Reform Coalition, end the two-party duopoly ElectoralReform Jun 2012 #32
Yes, I just wish that my candidate wins. n/t RebelOne Jun 2012 #34
Yes, do what you fucking said you would do to earn my vote in the first place! 11 Bravo Jun 2012 #35
Great post. cwydro Jun 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you ask for anything i...»Reply #32