Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm Back. And I Was Right. [View all]uppityperson
(116,022 posts)17. Others differ strongly with your opiniin
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-leonard-peltier-should-be-released-in-the-interest-of-justice-20170117-story.html
onse to your Monday editorial Clemency for Leonard Peltier? Never, I was the United States attorney who supervised the prosecution of Leonard Peltier during the critical post-trial period. In December 2016, I wrote to President Barack Obama to support his clemency petition as being in the best interests of justice in considering the totality of all matters involved.
Although no trial is perfect, Peltiers was unusually troublesome, particularly when viewed with the benefit of hindsight. The case against Peltier was a moving target, which shifted from a deliberate ambush theory in the earlier trial of Peltiers co-defendants (who were found not guilty) to a deliberate execution at Peltiers subsequent trial before a different judge, and then to an accomplice theory on appeal.
As an aider and abettor, according to the governments theory, Peltier was guilty of the murders because he was present, and he had a weapon. It was a very thin case that likely would not be upheld by courts today. It is a gross overstatement to label Peltier a cold-blooded murderer on the basis of the minimal proof that survived the appeals in his case.
Following the conclusion of the appeals, Judge Gerald Heaney, an Eighth Circuit judge who sat on two of the appeals, took the extraordinary step of writing to the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs urging it to grant clemency to Peltier in 1991.
Considering all of the surrounding factors, including the prevailing worldview of the time, the FBIs role in the creation of dangerous conditions on Pine Ridge, the manner in which the case was investigated and prosecuted and the extraordinary length of time already served, in my opinion, Peltier should be released in the interests of justice.
The government has gotten almost 41 years, and 41 pounds of flesh; Peltier is old and sick, and in my opinion, any more time served would be vindictive.
Although no trial is perfect, Peltiers was unusually troublesome, particularly when viewed with the benefit of hindsight. The case against Peltier was a moving target, which shifted from a deliberate ambush theory in the earlier trial of Peltiers co-defendants (who were found not guilty) to a deliberate execution at Peltiers subsequent trial before a different judge, and then to an accomplice theory on appeal.
As an aider and abettor, according to the governments theory, Peltier was guilty of the murders because he was present, and he had a weapon. It was a very thin case that likely would not be upheld by courts today. It is a gross overstatement to label Peltier a cold-blooded murderer on the basis of the minimal proof that survived the appeals in his case.
Following the conclusion of the appeals, Judge Gerald Heaney, an Eighth Circuit judge who sat on two of the appeals, took the extraordinary step of writing to the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs urging it to grant clemency to Peltier in 1991.
Considering all of the surrounding factors, including the prevailing worldview of the time, the FBIs role in the creation of dangerous conditions on Pine Ridge, the manner in which the case was investigated and prosecuted and the extraordinary length of time already served, in my opinion, Peltier should be released in the interests of justice.
The government has gotten almost 41 years, and 41 pounds of flesh; Peltier is old and sick, and in my opinion, any more time served would be vindictive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Our overlords, Admin, have provided a search box in the upper right hand corner
msanthrope
Jan 2017
#45
As a criminal defense attorney, I analyze his case from a legal point of view....
msanthrope
Jan 2017
#43
You seem to have missed the important bit "according to the governments theory"
uppityperson
Jan 2017
#57
Thank you for proving my point.....he's guilty, but as I explained below....
msanthrope
Jan 2017
#44
What were you right about? Out of that group Manning is the one who doesn't quite fit in
brush
Jan 2017
#25
We won the general election. Trump won the electoral college. She is the legimate
msanthrope
Jan 2017
#47
Yes, we were right. Manning was unstable and used terribly. Snowden was a spy
KittyWampus
Jan 2017
#62