General Discussion

Freethinker65

(11,203 posts)

32. Agree with you but I was referring to the tax cuts that those making over 250k/year

Thu Jan 19, 2017, 01:59 AM

Jan 2017

would get if the ACA was repealed. Those taxes currently generated help pay for the subsidies. The GOP top earners hate this part of the ACA the most (most high earners do not care that much about contraceptive coverage). Totally agree that it would currently be a logistical nightmare for an insurance provider in, say, Alabama, to insure a citizen in, say, rural Wisconsin. Setting up in-network hospitals, labs, physicians, etc. under managed care plans in multiple states, including both urban, and sparsely poplulated areas, is not something insurance companies want to do. Some states are already allowed to try this in the current ACA. It does not work.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOP Says Blue States Can Keep Their Health Care. Red State Deplorables Are on Their Own (WOW) [View all] DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 OP

so it's optional ACA? WTF? Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #1

Thank God I live in California where we take care of our own. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #2

Damn straight. nbsmom Jan 2017 #15

CA should take the money and set up statewide single payor. roamer65 Jan 2017 #19

We'll get flooded ... aggiesal Jan 2017 #23

Red Staters can't afford to move here. tinrobot Jan 2017 #33

They'll come here on vacation and get sick ... aggiesal Jan 2017 #36

Will Blue States get federal funding lapfog_1 Jan 2017 #3

They would get the same funding as they did under the ACA. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #4

Well, a lot of us red state dwellers techinically don't have it, anyway. GoCubsGo Jan 2017 #5

That's wrong. The cheapest plan for a single person is not $1500/month. CreekDog Jan 2017 #13

Regardless, it's still far more than I can afford. n/t GoCubsGo Jan 2017 #26

Regardless? You post a false number and you say "regardless"? CreekDog Jan 2017 #29

I changed it. Are you happy now? GoCubsGo Jan 2017 #34

GoCubs, you have automatic unlimited lifetime coverage Hortensis Jan 2017 #21

I have no health insurance, so the limits, etc. are meaningless. GoCubsGo Jan 2017 #25

Should have said "the ACA provides." These great Hortensis Jan 2017 #35

Regrets cilla4progress Jan 2017 #28

Don't spend too much time trying to assess what she said. That was Susan Collins, and most of the napi21 Jan 2017 #6

So do those making over 250K get their large tax cut with the partial ACA repeal plan?? Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #7

Glad I'm from a NORTHERN cilla4progress Jan 2017 #8

I can just imagine who gets insured and who doesn't in a Red state. Baitball Blogger Jan 2017 #9

Umhm. And most of the highest-profit hospitals are in poorer Hortensis Jan 2017 #22

The results of this experiment could make "blue states" of these "red states," in rather short order tritsofme Jan 2017 #10

Not if they give the tax cuts and take away all or part of the subsidies. Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #11

Refundable tax credits and subsidies are essentially the same thing Azathoth Jan 2017 #31

Agree with you but I was referring to the tax cuts that those making over 250k/year Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #32

Come On - We're Dealing With The Repugs Here..... global1 Jan 2017 #12

Yes, indeed. BigDemVoter Jan 2017 #14

This will not work lou ky dem Jan 2017 #16

Correct. How to do it is how OHIP does it in Ontario, Canada. roamer65 Jan 2017 #20

Sounds like a trap meant to minimize the blowback. SaschaHM Jan 2017 #17

I am planning on them fucking it up royally. roamer65 Jan 2017 #18

I thought this might happen. Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #24

AR gov wants a block grant WhiteTara Jan 2017 #27

That's really the best we can hope for Azathoth Jan 2017 #30

Then if they allow you to shop across states...everyone could still get ACA. cbdo2007 Jan 2017 #37