Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Most Americans oppose health law but like provisions [View all]NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)35. Since the 1990s, at least eight states have overhauled their insurance laws
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1206/23/hcsg.01.html
So, why does this all matter? I want to tell you a story. I think this is an important context. Since the 1990s, at least eight states have overhauled their insurance laws.
Kentucky is a typical example. In 1994 its new law told insurance companies you have to cover everyone even if they're chronically sick. You can't charge them too much money. Well, it's the same as Obama care but in Kentucky, there was no mandate.
Think of it like this. What if no one bought car insurance until their car was already wrecked on the side of the road? Insurance companies, car insurance companies probably couldn't last and that's pretty much what happened in Kentucky.
Before that law in Kentucky, there were 43 companies selling individual insurance policies. Seven years later there were two. And the law had to be changed, overhauled. It was much the same way in the other states as well.
If the Supreme Court strikes down just the mandate, the whole country now will be in that same boat. Of course, the court could also strike down the entire law or they could leave the entire law intact. Whatever it is, we're going to dig into it next week.
So, why does this all matter? I want to tell you a story. I think this is an important context. Since the 1990s, at least eight states have overhauled their insurance laws.
Kentucky is a typical example. In 1994 its new law told insurance companies you have to cover everyone even if they're chronically sick. You can't charge them too much money. Well, it's the same as Obama care but in Kentucky, there was no mandate.
Think of it like this. What if no one bought car insurance until their car was already wrecked on the side of the road? Insurance companies, car insurance companies probably couldn't last and that's pretty much what happened in Kentucky.
Before that law in Kentucky, there were 43 companies selling individual insurance policies. Seven years later there were two. And the law had to be changed, overhauled. It was much the same way in the other states as well.
If the Supreme Court strikes down just the mandate, the whole country now will be in that same boat. Of course, the court could also strike down the entire law or they could leave the entire law intact. Whatever it is, we're going to dig into it next week.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think this is a big lie pushed by the RW and the media. Who are they asking in these polls.
nanabugg
Jun 2012
#2
Yeah, what we really want is single payer, reform that will really cut costs. Open the door SCOTUS,
mother earth
Jun 2012
#5
Who processes the Medicare claims in your state for the Social Security Administration?
NNN0LHI
Jun 2012
#11
The new health care law will: -Ensure that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health c
dflprincess
Jun 2012
#62
This situation exists due to the negligence of the major media sources to accurately inform.
olegramps
Jun 2012
#18
Agreed 100%. Where's the seperation of church and state and why do they still get a tax exemption?
Auntie Bush
Jun 2012
#22
MAJOR discrepancy from the story: "Sixty-one percent of Americans are against the mandate."
Romulox
Jun 2012
#20
BUT just like the rest of the law I doubt they know what the mandate means to them
SoutherDem
Jun 2012
#32
Come on. It means they are FORCED to buy insurance from the same group that's been ripping them off
Romulox
Jun 2012
#34
It was trick that WRENCHED the debate to the far right. Now we are arguing about how much guaranteed
Romulox
Jun 2012
#39
Forcing people to buy the ones who are ripping them off seems a poor solution though...
Romulox
Jun 2012
#26
They figured it out, this time: ""Sixty-one percent of Americans are against the mandate." nt
Romulox
Jun 2012
#30
"In fact the state (Mass.) has the highest individual market premiums in the country,"
Romulox
Jun 2012
#48
The argument that the poor insurance companies wouldn't be able to make it is not a selling point
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#40