Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HoneyBadger

(2,297 posts)
56. Not exactly, it is about rights
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 10:17 PM
Jan 2017

Mission & Vision

We stand together in solidarity with our partners and children for the protection of our rights, our safety, our health, and our families - recognizing that our vibrant and diverse communities are the strength of our country.



OUR MISSION

The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us - immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of diverse religious faiths, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault - and our communities are hurting and scared. We are confronted with the question of how to move forward in the face of national and international concern and fear.

In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore. The Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women's rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.

We support the advocacy and resistance movements that reflect our multiple and intersecting identities. We call on all defenders of human rights to join us. This march is the first step towards unifying our communities, grounded in new relationships, to create change from the grassroots level up. We will not rest until women have parity and equity at all levels of leadership in society. We work peacefully while recognizing there is no true peace without justice and equity for all.

HEAR OUR VOICE.

It is not our differences that divide us. It is our inability to recognize, accept, and celebrate those differences.
— Audre Lorde
GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Women’s rights are human rights, regardless of a woman’s race, ethnicity, religion, immigration status, sexual identity, gender expression, economic status, age or disability. We practice empathy with the intent to learn about the intersecting identities of each other. We will suspend our first judgement and do our best to lead without ego. We follow the principles of Kingian nonviolence, which are defined as follows:

Principle 1: Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people. It is a positive force confronting the forces of injustice and utilizes the righteous indignation and spiritual, emotional, and intellectual capabilities of people as the vital force for change and reconciliation.

Principle 2: The Beloved Community is the framework for the future. The nonviolent concept is an overall effort to achieve a reconciled world by raising the level of relationships among people to a height where justice prevails and persons attain their full human potential.

Principle 3: Attack forces of evil, not persons doing evil. The nonviolent approach helps one analyze the fundamental conditions, policies and practices of the conflict rather than reacting to one’s opponents or their personalities.

Principle 4: Accept suffering without retaliation for the sake of the cause to achieve our goal. Self-chosen suffering is redemptive and helps the movement grow in a spiritual as well as a humanitarian dimension. The moral authority of voluntary suffering for a goal communicates the concern to one’s own friends and community as well as to the opponent.

Principle 5: Avoid internal violence of the spirit as well as external physical violence. The nonviolent attitude permeates all aspects of the campaign. It provides a mirror type reflection of the reality of the condition to one’s opponent and the community at large. Specific activities must be designed to maintain a high level of spirit and morale during a nonviolent campaign.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is awful!!! nt LAS14 Jan 2017 #1
Consider signing this petition oberliner Jan 2017 #12
I did. Thanks. LAS14 Jan 2017 #30
Done! mcar Jan 2017 #48
Signed!! N/T radical noodle Jan 2017 #72
Signed! Cha Jan 2017 #200
Agreed scscholar Jan 2017 #33
What is with some of these Sanders supporters? Let the Hillary hate go already brush Jan 2017 #180
Welcome to the world of coalition-based, independent movements Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #2
Some folks are pissed about them leaving HRC off their list of honorees oberliner Jan 2017 #4
That's all well and good but this is an independent movement Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #13
None of their honorees are partisans? oberliner Jan 2017 #16
Fair enough, I missed that. Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #26
This doesn't sound independent to me at all. yardwork Jan 2017 #37
Not ALL the organizers. Many are strong Hillary supporters. It's a diverse group. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #147
Well, it's troubling to me that at least one national co-chair helped Trump win. yardwork Jan 2017 #148
All the people who oppose DT need to work together now, no matter pnwmom Jan 2017 #149
Does the co-chair oppose Trump? It's not clear to me that she does. yardwork Jan 2017 #150
She is not "the co-chair" -- she is one of four. pnwmom Jan 2017 #160
By campaigning against Charles Bukowski Jan 2017 #174
I see no indication that she campaigned against Hillary in the general. pnwmom Jan 2017 #175
Are you saying that the OP is incorrect? yardwork Jan 2017 #178
I'm saying I did a google search and couldn't come up with a link. pnwmom Jan 2017 #188
That's a direct quote encouraging people to vote against Hillary. yardwork Jan 2017 #193
The first sentence is a quote from HRC's 1995 speech in Beijing. Yet they don't credit her emulatorloo Jan 2017 #40
"We believe that Womens Rights are Human Rights and Human Rights are Womens Rights." Cha Jan 2017 #199
Clinton wasn't the first to use that phrase Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #220
So? It came to prominence as the name of a speech given by Hillary Clinton, the First Lady of the Cha Jan 2017 #223
There are other partisan political folks on the list as well, such as Bella Abzug and Barbara Jordan oberliner Jan 2017 #58
For The Democrats to win, Jim Beard Jan 2017 #129
The Greens definitely count when it comes to partisanship. They are Republican stooges. DanTex Jan 2017 #202
Sorry for them but I am very partisan. Jim Beard Jan 2017 #125
That's stupid, divisive and all kinds of wrong. But it shouldn't deter anyone The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2017 #3
Agreed oberliner Jan 2017 #5
She's just the one person who organized it and can choose to add Hillary's name. I'm not going. kcr Jan 2017 #52
This is why Democrats lose elections they should win. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2017 #65
One can say that snubbing Hillary is why Democrats lose elections they should win oberliner Jan 2017 #69
Exactly. yardwork Jan 2017 #73
Snubbing Hillary regarding this march is stupid, but The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2017 #75
That's not what the purpose of the march is oberliner Jan 2017 #85
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #224
She is the reason we lose. She actively campaigned against Hillary in the general for fuck's sake. kcr Jan 2017 #80
I agree completely. yardwork Jan 2017 #83
So we should just pick one primary candidate and then all vote for them? hollowdweller Jan 2017 #132
Apparently she campaigned against Clinton in the general. deurbano Jan 2017 #170
"and working together toward a goal" - Cut your nose off to spite your face keithbvadu2 Jan 2017 #115
When did the greens do anything for us except draw away votes........ Jim Beard Jan 2017 #134
Not true. She's one of four co-chairs. And it's also not true that she worked pnwmom Jan 2017 #190
That is a direct quote of her working against Hillary in the GE. yardwork Jan 2017 #194
No, it's a recognition of the critical role of the swing states. pnwmom Jan 2017 #198
Nobody thought Pennsylvania or Michigan were swing states. yardwork Jan 2017 #213
She lost by 80,000 in 3 states, including the swing states of PA and MI. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #214
That is exactly my point. yardwork Jan 2017 #215
No, it isn't. Those states are traditional swing states and she was NOT saying pnwmom Jan 2017 #217
I disagree. Once the false narrative is out there it can't be controlled. yardwork Jan 2017 #218
The cause of the march is bigger than Hillary or a petty organizer. killbotfactory Jan 2017 #6
That is true oberliner Jan 2017 #8
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #7
That makes no sense oberliner Jan 2017 #10
So now Bernie Sanders supporters are deplorable?! Arazi Jan 2017 #9
Bernie Sanders supporters are not deplorable oberliner Jan 2017 #11
Same fucking thing. It's stupid Arazi Jan 2017 #15
No, it's not oberliner Jan 2017 #19
I agree that it is petty and divisive of the organizers to disrespect Hillary this way. yardwork Jan 2017 #22
Why don't they have her speak? Does anybody know if she is attending?? hollowdweller Jan 2017 #122
I find it hard to believe she hasn't heard about it Bettie Jan 2017 #183
NO it is not the same. Cha Jan 2017 #34
How is it the same fucking thing? kcr Jan 2017 #60
She actually got off her butt and organized! Did you? Arazi Jan 2017 #71
She did not initiate it oberliner Jan 2017 #91
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #98
What a hateful and divisive thing to say oberliner Jan 2017 #101
No we lose because we get caught.up in this petty bullshit Arazi Jan 2017 #105
I exhort everyone to march oberliner Jan 2017 #107
Agreed 100% Arazi Jan 2017 #109
Glad we can find common ground oberliner Jan 2017 #114
No one is saying Not to March.. it was petty to leave Hillary name Cha Jan 2017 #197
The "divisive shit" was leaving Hillary's name off the list. lapucelle Jan 2017 #89
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #94
It should oberliner Jan 2017 #97
Nobody here gives a shit @ them tho. This is Manufactured Outrage (tm) Arazi Jan 2017 #100
Well, the passion for Hillary is more immediate and current oberliner Jan 2017 #103
Manufactured outrage , my ass. apcalc Jan 2017 #204
Divisive is not putting Hillary's name on the list of Honorees.. Cha Jan 2017 #208
Exactly. The false equivalencies have to stop. yardwork Jan 2017 #216
They're all over the place.. permeating the board. Cha Jan 2017 #222
You wanna know what pisses me off? lapucelle Jan 2017 #110
If it is a womans movement, why not? If you run out of ink writing those few names, Jim Beard Jan 2017 #139
Likewise, the march is about us, not Clinton. Beartracks Jan 2017 #155
My name's not there either. OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #192
Thanks so much Arazi, for calling something important to us apcalc Jan 2017 #203
Stop shoving words in people's mouths. emulatorloo Jan 2017 #55
Yeah, I'm furious Rosa Parks name isn't on that list!!11! Arazi Jan 2017 #76
Seems strange to have left her off the list as well oberliner Jan 2017 #96
It's an odd list, given the ommissions. They shouldn't have included the list imo. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #221
I'm annoyed Sarsour used a HRC quote as their guiding principle but wont't credit it emulatorloo Jan 2017 #119
Yes. deurbano Jan 2017 #173
No, but any Bernie supporter, like I was, am elmac Jan 2017 #108
I dont fucking care one bit. Are you with us against the orange monster now? Arazi Jan 2017 #113
Hey, I don't care if she is a deplorable elmac Jan 2017 #128
this sounds like an effort KT2000 Jan 2017 #14
I don't think so oberliner Jan 2017 #20
especially the timing of it. FSogol Jan 2017 #86
It really does. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #126
Several are obvious trolls RandiFan1290 Jan 2017 #196
That's very disappointing. How petty of the organizers. yardwork Jan 2017 #17
Have you signed the petition? oberliner Jan 2017 #23
Done. Thank you for the link and this thread. yardwork Jan 2017 #24
I signed it. LisaM Jan 2017 #32
Signed! Mahalo for this convenient way to sign, oberliner! Cha Jan 2017 #35
If people are just figuring this out today, they didn't do their homework Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #31
I found out yesterday.. we find out when we find out. Cha Jan 2017 #36
+1000. This has been known for weeks Arazi Jan 2017 #44
The list of honorees was released yesterday, apparently. yardwork Jan 2017 #57
The goals, mission and organisers are no mystery. Why isn't Rosa Parks included?!11!! Arazi Jan 2017 #64
What an odd reaction oberliner Jan 2017 #99
Or recognize that the organizers get to structure this as they like Arazi Jan 2017 #104
A reasonable option is to sign a petition oberliner Jan 2017 #106
Manufactured outrage ...you keep saying that apcalc Jan 2017 #205
Or how about just encouraging them to include Hillary Clinton? oberliner Jan 2017 #59
You knew this and were fine with it? yardwork Jan 2017 #45
everyone i have seen that are going supported hillary and don't know anything about this list JI7 Jan 2017 #18
Here is a link oberliner Jan 2017 #21
the problem is one person who seems like one of those career types JI7 Jan 2017 #165
Good! Hillary's name should definitely be on the list whether Cha Jan 2017 #38
If Satan wants to organize a march against Trump than I'm going to attend...plus the TrekLuver Jan 2017 #25
Satan would never organize a march against himself elmac Jan 2017 #112
It's not a march against Trump oberliner Jan 2017 #118
Yeah I know but for me it is. And the organizers can go and say whatever they want but TrekLuver Jan 2017 #127
I hear ya oberliner Jan 2017 #131
HRC should be LEADING the March. no_hypocrisy Jan 2017 #27
And, she kept it under wraps until the 11th hour. LisaM Jan 2017 #28
No, she didn't keep it under wraps. The group's website is available to anyone Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #42
The list of names was put up on the 19th. LisaM Jan 2017 #53
The 19th, yesterday? Jim Beard Jan 2017 #140
Correct. LisaM Jan 2017 #189
No. It was released on the 12th or maybe earlier Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #211
This is NOT true. This was released on the 12th or earlier Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #210
I'm wearing my "A woman's place is in the White House" shirt tomorrow. n/t cynatnite Jan 2017 #29
That is great elmac Jan 2017 #116
For those who are surprised by any of this, I suggest visiting this site: Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #39
The list was released yesterday. LisaM Jan 2017 #138
I'm a bit behind the times here. What is the stated purpose of the march? jalan48 Jan 2017 #41
Website here: Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #43
Thanks-as I read the FAQ page the march is about "women's rights as human rights". jalan48 Jan 2017 #54
Yes, Hillary's famous phrase was used, but Hillary herself was left off the honoree list oberliner Jan 2017 #63
It seems to be a big omission. She was the first female candidate for President, like her or not. jalan48 Jan 2017 #68
Well, actually, Shirley Chisholm was the first female candidate for President, from either of KingCharlemagne Jan 2017 #177
True-I should have said major party. jalan48 Jan 2017 #179
LOL - Shirley Chisholm was a great Democrat, but she did not KingCharlemagne Jan 2017 #181
A little reminder for us: Excerpt from HRC's speech on September 5th 1995, in Beijing, China emulatorloo Jan 2017 #66
Not exactly, it is about rights HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #56
Thank you-this was very helpful. jalan48 Jan 2017 #61
Of course it's about rights. That's not the point. LisaM Jan 2017 #62
Rosa Parks, Susan B Anthony, Marie Curie - also left off Arazi Jan 2017 #90
She needs to get on the right side of the sh't quick. democratisphere Jan 2017 #46
I think it's a good idea NOT to make it about politicians Warpy Jan 2017 #47
THIS eShirl Jan 2017 #201
Wear Your Hillary Gear, Problem Solved. KittyWampus Jan 2017 #49
Hillary Supporters need to shout her name and make their presence felt... JHan Jan 2017 #50
Hate this but still going gwheezie Jan 2017 #51
god I wish you people would quit with this BS already... chillfactor Jan 2017 #67
Huh? oberliner Jan 2017 #144
I don't care. truebluegreen Jan 2017 #70
And so of course this means the entire march PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2017 #74
Hold together, people. Don't let posts like this divide us. nolabear Jan 2017 #77
Who cares? OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #78
Can progressives have arguments with one another? oberliner Jan 2017 #164
According to you, OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #191
Not true oberliner Jan 2017 #212
This is SO typical. Hillary is needlessly insulted. People who like her speak up. LisaM Jan 2017 #79
Thanks for the heads up Ob. I signed the petition and will be their still_one Jan 2017 #81
and yet Dolores Huerta and Gloria Steinem (also Co-Chairs) campaigned for Hillary. Turn CO Blue Jan 2017 #82
David Brock? oberliner Jan 2017 #163
If she campaigned against Hillary in the general RandySF Jan 2017 #84
Exactly. yardwork Jan 2017 #95
I have more respect liquid diamond Jan 2017 #123
On local NPR here in Florida HopeAgain Jan 2017 #87
So, I guess getting out and showing Trump we won't tolerate his crap Raine Jan 2017 #88
This is a discussion board, isn't it? oberliner Jan 2017 #161
Okay matt819 Jan 2017 #92
I notice the posters claiming this is fake are ignoring this thread and links. yardwork Jan 2017 #93
They are fooling no one. BainsBane Jan 2017 #227
I had a thought... Equinox Moon Jan 2017 #102
Check out this article oberliner Jan 2017 #117
Maybe or maybe not, but it's a media/social media mess. janx Jan 2017 #120
We continue to shoot liquid diamond Jan 2017 #111
circular firing squad elmac Jan 2017 #121
careful Skittles Jan 2017 #124
Discussion forums are for discussions oberliner Jan 2017 #159
o my dog,,, pitch forks and torches folks, circle our outrage and get her!! juxtaposed Jan 2017 #130
o my god,, the ignorance. Jakes Progress Jan 2017 #184
Yes its shitty but what is your goal marlakay Jan 2017 #133
Let's try to get Hillary included as an honoree oberliner Jan 2017 #135
We can do that without spreading disharmony marlakay Jan 2017 #136
Discussion forums are for discussions oberliner Jan 2017 #142
THE GOP wants you to stay home, please don't listen! JoeOtterbein Jan 2017 #137
No one should stay home oberliner Jan 2017 #157
Every time another Hillary supporter Uponthegears Jan 2017 #141
Facts are facts oberliner Jan 2017 #143
I'm willing to take you at your word Uponthegears Jan 2017 #146
Your point is taken oberliner Jan 2017 #151
Terrific post Uponthegears Jan 2017 #176
So why is Hillary not one of the honorees? The thought of her being excluded is ridiculous... brush Jan 2017 #187
While anything I say Uponthegears Jan 2017 #195
There are other honorees, right? How would Hillary being one mark the day as a tribute to her? brush Jan 2017 #206
Because the MSM hates us Uponthegears Jan 2017 #207
FAKE NEWS MANIA! Equinox Moon Jan 2017 #145
I want the march to be succesful oberliner Jan 2017 #156
Exactly the point Bettie Jan 2017 #182
Hillary's campaign is over. n/t DefenseLawyer Jan 2017 #152
It is, because of people like Sarsour BainsBane Jan 2017 #226
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #153
Thanks for deleting the obscenities oberliner Jan 2017 #154
I have my own opinions on why this thread was started. KittyWampus Jan 2017 #158
What are they? oberliner Jan 2017 #166
Who give a fuck melman Jan 2017 #162
Almost 7,000 people have signed the petition so far oberliner Jan 2017 #168
It's not a non issue to all those who have signed the petition Cha Jan 2017 #209
Wow - there sure have been many attempts to make sure this march doesn't happen myrna minx Jan 2017 #167
Yup. Make a note of who is doing it. KittyWampus Jan 2017 #169
Why? oberliner Jan 2017 #172
The march will definitely happen oberliner Jan 2017 #171
"Don't blame me. I voted for Hillary" Jakes Progress Jan 2017 #185
Yes! I'm taking my Hillary sign! BainsBane Jan 2017 #228
I don't think she campaigned against Hillary in the general election fishwax Jan 2017 #186
Wonder what her JPR name is...nt SidDithers Jan 2017 #219
She campaigned for Trump BainsBane Jan 2017 #225
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Co-Chair of the Women...»Reply #56