Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New NSA docs contradict Bush Administration 9-11 claims [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)76. Another story that went un-reported: GORE WON!
Not That It Was Reported, but Gore Won
by Jim Naureckas
Published on Thursday, November 15, 2001 in the Long Island, NY Newsday
EXCERPT...
The consortium determined that if the U.S. Supreme Court had allowed the ongoing recount to go through, George W. Bush would still likely have ended up in the White House. That's because the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court - as well as the more limited recount asked for by Democratic candidate Al Gore - only involved so-called undervotes, ballots that when counted mechanically registered no choice for president.
Gore and the Florida Supreme Court ignored overvotes - votes where mechanical counting registered more than one vote - on the assumption that there would be no way to tell which of the multiple candidates the voter actually intended to pick.
But as the consortium found when it actually looked at the overvotes, one often could tell what the voter's intent was. Many of the overvotes involved, for example, a voter punching the hole next to a candidate's name, and then writing in the same candidate's name.
Since the intent of the voter is clear, these are clearly valid votes under Florida law. And Gore picked up enough of such votes that it almost didn't matter what standard you used when looking at undervotes - whether you counted every dimple or insisted on a fully punched chad, the consortium found that Gore ended up the winner of virtually any full reexamination of rejected ballots.
SNIP...
War or no war, many journalists are instinctively protective of the legitimacy of the institutions they cover, but the job of a journalist is not to promote but to question. The theory behind the First Amendment is that the system will be strengthened by an unflinching look at the system's flaws. In looking back at the results of the Florida election, the media flinched.
SOURCE:
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1115-02.htm
If it weren't so treasonous, it'd be funny how the news cycle works.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The odd thing here is that the CTC budget more than quadrupled 1997-9/11. What happened is
leveymg
Jun 2012
#22
Black, at least, is doing well these days. Oh well, there's still real hope for...One Day: Justice!
Octafish
Jun 2012
#26
Black was the nuts and bolts guy - look up the chain of command at who authorized all this, and why.
leveymg
Jun 2012
#86
Actually Cole bombing happened under Cheney (privatized logistics in 91) and his KBR (Halliburton)
blm
Jun 2012
#10
I never believed the Cole was anything but deliberate by the fascists involved with Bush-Cheney
blm
Jun 2012
#65
I never really figured out what The Cole was all about, other than a provocation
leveymg
Jun 2012
#69
Jim Hatfield wrote Bush afraid of bin Laden aerial attack at G-7 summit in Geneva in April 2001...
Octafish
Jun 2012
#28
Just as more alert citizens have been saying for over a decade now. Too bad the most comprehensive
blm
Jun 2012
#8
Yep, report is getting no traction, just like they planned when they kicked up FandF's faux outrage
blm
Jun 2012
#42
I have always figured there is enough dirt in Government archives to shut down Republicans.
gordianot
Jun 2012
#9
The right will attack this disclosure as politically motivated in order to divert attention from the
Citizen Worker
Jun 2012
#15
Me, too, Doctor. Amazing how much criminality is made plain, yet nothing happens to the crooks.
Octafish
Jun 2012
#41
Looks to me like the intelligence community wants to set the record straight...
ljm2002
Jun 2012
#23
The PNAC is still pursuing its agenda. It's been delayed a little because as you said, Iraq
sabrina 1
Jun 2012
#61
Profound. So, what have you to say regarding the CIA data dump showing Bush knew and did nothing?
Octafish
Jun 2012
#54
Bush isn't the issue, or did you miss that? Well, you weren't around here during the Bush years
sabrina 1
Jun 2012
#68
A WAR CRIMINAL THAT COMMITTED TREASON IS TERRIBLE TO BEHOLD-WORSE IS THE UNACCOUNTABILITY.
bobthedrummer
Jun 2012
#72
I haven't forgotten the Texas vacations of that war criminal nor who and what his "top advisors"
bobthedrummer
Jun 2012
#40
I'd like to silently feed them, breakfast and lunch-slide the tray through the slot into their pod!
bobthedrummer
Jun 2012
#57
Did Brian Williams report it on NBC yet? Did Diane Sawyer of CBS report it? That other guy on ABC?
Major Hogwash
Jun 2012
#47
Diane SAWYER is with ABC; btw, she was mentored by Nixon's Press Sec Ron ZIEGLER n/t
bobthedrummer
Jun 2012
#58
We all learn something everyday, Major. Otherwise we'd be dead, imo. No coincidences in politics!
bobthedrummer
Jun 2012
#71
So, 'bin Laden determined to strike in the United States' wasn't the only time Bush heard.
Octafish
Jun 2012
#78