Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 11:41 PM Jun 2012

Another idiotic school policy that hurts children. [View all]

Another school administration with no common sense.

And two children, with blistering sunburns, who have just doubled their lifetime risk of melanoma.

This was the children's first field day, and their mother wasn't aware of the district's anti-sunscreen policy. Take a look at the girls' pictures if you don't think this is a serious issue.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/22/jesse-michener-sunburn_n_1618964.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular


On Tuesday, sisters Violet, 11, and Zoe, 9, came home from school with severe sunburns -- they were outside for 5 hours for field day and were not allowed to apply sunscreen because of a school policy, their mom posted on her blog.

"Two of my three children experienced significant sunburns. Like, hurts-to-look-at burns," Jesse Michener from Washington wrote. It was raining that morning, so Michener didn't apply sunscreen on her kids. But even if she had, the kids would have needed another coat once the sun came out (the AAP recommends applying sunscreen with an SPF of at least 15 every two hours). The girls weren't allowed to put any sunblock on though, and the reason cited was school policy.

Tacoma Public School district spokesman Dan Voelpel told Yahoo! Shine that, according to statewide law, teachers are not allowed to apply sunscreen to students and students can only apply it to themselves if they have a doctor's note.

Mom was particularly outraged because her daughter Zoe has a form of Albinism. She said the school's staff was aware of her condition, and they still didn't make an exception.

SNIP

(PHOTOS AT LINK)

_____________________________

More from the mother's blog:

http://lifephotographed.com/2012/06/burn-babies-burn/

I took all three children to Tacoma General last night and their burns were met with concern from doctors and staff alike. Violet is starting to blister on her face. Both children have headaches, chills and pain. Two are home today as a direct result of how terrible they feel.
As much as I am saddened about the burns, I realize my deepest concerns revolve around everything but the sunburns.

Let me back up a bit and share what I experienced yesterday: after seeing the kids upon returning home from work, I immediately went to the school to speak with the principal. Her response centered around the the school inability to administer what they considered a prescription/medication (sunscreen) for liability reasons. And while I can sort of wrap my brain around this in theory, the practice of a blanket policy which clearly allows for students to be put in harm’s way is deeply flawed. Not only does a parent have to take an unrealistic (an un-intuitive) step by visiting a doctor for a “prescription” for an over-the-counter product, children are not allowed to carry it on their person and apply as needed. Had my children gone to school slathered in sunscreen (which they did not, it was raining), by noon – when the sun came out – they would have needed to reapply anyway. Something as simple as as sun hat might seem to bypass the prescription issue to some extent. Alas, hats are not allowed at school, even on field day.

My children indicated that several adults commented on their burns at school, including staff and other parents. One of my children remarked that their teacher used sunscreen in her presence and that it was “just for her.” So, is this an issue of passive, inactive supervision? Where is the collective awareness for student safety? If they were getting stung by bees, teachers would remove them. Staff need to be awake to possible threats or safety issues and be able to take action. Prolonged sun exposure leads to burns: either put sunscreen on or, at the very least, remove the child from the sun. A simple call would have brought me to that school in minutes to assist my kids.

SNIP

89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sunburn is the white man's burden XemaSab Jun 2012 #1
another racial stereotype rears its head. nt msongs Jun 2012 #13
You're saying it is a "racial stereotype" to think that pnwmom Jun 2012 #18
Darker skinned people should NOT blow off skin cancer eridani Jun 2012 #72
No one said they should. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #73
A teacher should have sent the child to the Ilsa Jun 2012 #2
The problem is, the district WAS treating sunscreen like a medication, pnwmom Jun 2012 #9
That's overboard for a product Ilsa Jun 2012 #68
It hurts to look at those children. PDJane Jun 2012 #3
I've had that kind of burn, too, back when they didn't have good sunscreens. pnwmom Jun 2012 #10
Sue them, and let them learn what a liability issue is really all about. Liberty Belle Jun 2012 #4
I think at least it would rise to the level of neglect, pnwmom Jun 2012 #16
We had a lengthy discussion on Facebook about this the other day proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #5
I'm not following you XemaSab Jun 2012 #6
The school will make sure they put on sunscreen if mom sends it to school. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #8
That is NOT true! The school required a doctor's note for the child to bring her OWN sunscreen pnwmom Jun 2012 #14
She was on a 504. The parent signs off on a 504. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #17
The district has already acknowledged that their policy was wrong, and it will be changed pnwmom Jun 2012 #21
I'm not defending the district. I've said many times already they were wrong. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #25
It was raining all morning. And the mother wasn't clear about what Field Day was, because pnwmom Jun 2012 #32
"Everyone's at fault!" Scootaloo Jun 2012 #36
Apparently she didn't know - it was rainy in the morning TBF Jun 2012 #88
In our latitude at this time of year, too much sun is rarely a problem -- at least pnwmom Jun 2012 #24
If someone has albinism, too much sun is *always* a problem. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #48
Not apparently for this girl. Whatever form of albinism she has hasn't pnwmom Jun 2012 #49
Yes, apparently, for this girl, or else we wouldn't be having this discussion. God. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #53
We are saying two different things. pnwmom Jun 2012 #54
The children should have been kept at home or indoors lapislzi Jun 2012 #43
The mother didn't know about the sunscreen policy or what Field Day entailed.n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #50
Common sense is notably absent. lapislzi Jun 2012 #55
I have to believe you, but... lapislzi Jun 2012 #69
No, the school required a doctor's prescription in order for the child to bring her own sunscreen. pnwmom Jun 2012 #12
And the mom knew that. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #19
Wrong. The mother wasn't informed about the need for a doctor's note pnwmom Jun 2012 #22
She was on a 504 because of her sun allergies. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #26
Yeah, right. Except you weren't there and you haven't read the 504. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #87
That's not at issue. lapislzi Jun 2012 #51
The mother didn't know that a note from the doctor was required. pnwmom Jun 2012 #52
The children are 9 and 11. lapislzi Jun 2012 #56
The school district's policy was that a child couldn't self-apply sunscreen pnwmom Jun 2012 #75
I'm not arguing with you that the policy is dumb. It is totally dumb. lapislzi Jun 2012 #80
But the individual mother's mistake doesn't affect anyone but her family. The state's policy, pnwmom Jun 2012 #81
Ah. Well, that is a reasonable discussion. lapislzi Jun 2012 #83
Chapstick! That's a great example. pnwmom Jun 2012 #86
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jun 2012 #7
At least one of these girls was on a 504 proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #11
Did you read her blog? The policy prevented the girls from applying their OWN sunscreen pnwmom Jun 2012 #15
The child was so sun allergic she was on a 504 proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #20
SHE DIDN'T KNOW THE POLICY REQUIRED A DOCTOR'S NOTE. pnwmom Jun 2012 #23
That's baloney. Every school on the planet sends home a list of school policies. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #27
delete -- dupe. pnwmom Jun 2012 #30
You are making this up. You don't know what is in the 504. You don't know that the need for the note pnwmom Jun 2012 #31
I write 504s. I know exactly what goes in them. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #33
Do you write them in that school in that Tacoma district? You have no idea pnwmom Jun 2012 #37
She has severe sun allergies. What do you THINK was in her 504? proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #42
You are hell bent on defending the school district even though they've apologized pnwmom Jun 2012 #44
That other poster is absolutely blaming BOTH the parent and the school. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #82
Please point to a statement in any article that the mother did not send sunscreen with the girl. pnwmom Jun 2012 #89
You answered your own question. lapislzi Jun 2012 #58
I know that my own children were reluctant to be singled out for special treatment, pnwmom Jun 2012 #60
Or to take the child indoors! lapislzi Jun 2012 #45
If the student was on a 504 Sgent Jun 2012 #29
How do you know the school never requested it! proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #34
You don't understand the weather around here. Sun usually isn't a problem at this time pnwmom Jun 2012 #46
That's insane. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #28
They're scared of lawsuits because parents threaten to file them. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #35
Have you ever once heard of a lawsuit filed by a parent because pnwmom Jun 2012 #38
people file lawsuits about lots of things that get laughed out of court. but even to get to court HiPointDem Jun 2012 #39
School district policies shouldn't be driven by sheer paranoia. pnwmom Jun 2012 #40
hmm. as i understood it, your children don't go to public schools. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #41
They each spent between 6 - 9 years in the public schools. pnwmom Jun 2012 #47
hmm. your posts don't seem to reflect that. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #59
Have you been stalking me? pnwmom Jun 2012 #61
that's because i haven't been stalking you. i just noticed you're often found in teacher-bashing HiPointDem Jun 2012 #62
You haven't been paying attention to the many posts I've made supporting pnwmom Jun 2012 #63
maybe not. i will in the future. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #65
I don't know...sunscreen's like poison... Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #57
Some are better than others. But it's still up to the parents to decide -- or it should be. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #64
If it was anything else, I would agree. Guess just pet peeve how people blindly slather Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #74
It's only school policy because it's state law B2G Jun 2012 #66
No, it's not. pnwmom Jun 2012 #76
so many things don't make sense here ctaylors6 Jun 2012 #67
All of your questions are excellent ones. pnwmom Jun 2012 #77
Why did the mom not call this to the school's attention before Field Day? revolution breeze Jun 2012 #70
She did. But she didn't know that Field Day meant being outside all day, pnwmom Jun 2012 #71
It's Washington revolution breeze Jun 2012 #78
This mother should not have had to send a doctor's note for sunscreen. It was a dumb policy, pnwmom Jun 2012 #79
This mother is an idiot... joeybee12 Jun 2012 #84
Doesn't everyone need sunscreen in those conditions Nikia Jun 2012 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another idiotic school po...