General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No one should be "delighted" to work with DT on any issue, no matter [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)the person who you keep saying said something that that person didn't actually say. You think other people don't put two and two together, maybe, I don't know, use Google? And somebody mentioned Sanders before I did in this thread, not that I care about the lid coming off that strange secret.
Purposely "avoiding" saying his name BUT using the precise word used, is just silly, if not full on disingenuous. What was the value of that. Was it intended so that you could accuse him of doing something he didn't do, without actually accusing him of it, so that everybody in the know could come around and totally dump on him while you all smirkingly pretend like this is just some principled stance?
It's a ridiculous stance at that. I guess Obama normalized Trump when he went through the whole ceremony of transferring power to him, shaking his hand, etc. etc. Why not just say "Suck it Drumpf you aren't legit", and then blow him a raspberry?
Issues first. There will be ample opportunity to dress this lousy sack of shit down based upon his policies and rhetoric that suck, and little opportunity not to .By the way, other people have stated on this board that we should deny every policy under the Sun if it comes from Trump or the GOP. Well we fucking know how likely it is that anything actually good will come out of this man, but if it did, people actually think that we should deny the American people of something that would benefit their lives just because the Republicans were okay with doing that for the last 8 years, and because Trump is a shit? That is the pettiest bullshit I hope to ever hear on DU.