Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No TeamPooka Jun 2012 #1
No. Aristus Jun 2012 #2
Yes. nt AJTheMan Jun 2012 #3
Thank you for your honesty. (nt) Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #4
Don't feed the trolls lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #5
Answer the question. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #8
No. Meaning "no, I won't answer your question." lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #9
Okay. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #10
So you don't like Kagan. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #14
Fallacy. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #17
The jurist is not anti-gay...nt SidDithers Jun 2012 #28
So ProSense Jun 2012 #51
It's not a "right to abortion" but a "right to privacy" HubertHeaver Jun 2012 #6
No prevarication. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #7
You are barking up the wrong tree. HubertHeaver Jun 2012 #12
Then would you tolerate a Democratic nominee who would say Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #13
Now you are changing the original statement. HubertHeaver Jun 2012 #22
Thank you. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #31
I took your bait. As someone up-thread implied, HubertHeaver Jun 2012 #47
Three reasons. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #61
This poll isn't about abortion at all... SidDithers Jun 2012 #26
A simple yes or no answer... kentuck Jun 2012 #16
No prevarication. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #18
I would not tolerate such a divisive question... kentuck Jun 2012 #24
Answer the question. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #34
Your question is not worthy of a yes or no answer. kentuck Jun 2012 #35
Then you have no right to discuss Elena Kagan. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #36
That is not what you asked in your poll. kentuck Jun 2012 #37
I don't think that word means what you think it means kdmorris Jun 2012 #48
I was about to post the same thing. Chiyo-chichi Jun 2012 #56
I think that was what my caffeine deprived brain kdmorris Jun 2012 #57
Answer this question first... SidDithers Jun 2012 #11
No. Chorophyll Jun 2012 #15
You don't. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #19
I believe I just did that. Chorophyll Jun 2012 #21
My apologies. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #23
A couple of things dsc Jun 2012 #20
Not entirely. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #29
The civil right of a person to own and posses a firearm for self defense (per Heller) is attacked kelly1mm Jun 2012 #43
To be honest? Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #60
And to clarify and emphasize: Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #33
I agree GCP Jun 2012 #52
Nope. And I find the entire idea absurd that they would need say anything... clang1 Jun 2012 #25
Pass.... this is a moot and irrelevant question Gman Jun 2012 #27
No prevarication. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #30
Sorry to disrupt your black and white world Gman Jun 2012 #42
That word does not mean what you think it does. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #50
I know which word I used Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #58
HRC on Elena Kagen... SidDithers Jun 2012 #32
+100 n/t Tx4obama Jun 2012 #39
The HRC does not speak for the majority of LGBT Americans n/t FreeState Jun 2012 #41
Neither does Pab...nt SidDithers Jun 2012 #55
The Beatles! TlalocW Jun 2012 #38
No. EFerrari Jun 2012 #40
Yes. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #44
You're good Brother Buzz Jun 2012 #46
Thank you. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #59
The question is ambiguous. geek tragedy Jun 2012 #45
I agree with that Douglas Carpenter Jun 2012 #66
This is like ProSense Jun 2012 #49
Not every good thing is a Constitutional right Macoy51 Jun 2012 #54
I voted 'no' but obviously it is not for me to 'tolerate' another country's judges or otherwise LeftishBrit Jun 2012 #53
No nominee would say it to begin with... cynatnite Jun 2012 #62
Yet, a nominee DID say that Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #63
That's disingenuous... cynatnite Jun 2012 #64
Civil rights are civil rights Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #65
You are still being disingenuous... cynatnite Jun 2012 #79
I can see there is no discussing things logically with you. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #82
That is not true... cynatnite Jun 2012 #84
No Bettie Jun 2012 #67
No JonLP24 Jun 2012 #68
This is sort of a trick question, I think. I voted 'no' then realized coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #69
As you doubtless know, you give too little info for a rational choice to be made dmallind Jun 2012 #70
Just answer the question. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #71
Just ask a question that makes sense dmallind Jun 2012 #76
It makes sense. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #78
No, but the Supremes don't usually check with me. Vidar Jun 2012 #72
Yes One_Life_To_Give Jun 2012 #73
Yes sarisataka Jun 2012 #74
Kick for Elena Kagen... SidDithers Jun 2012 #75
It depends. AngryAmish Jun 2012 #77
This is really about gay marriage... cynatnite Jun 2012 #80
Not at all. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #81
You cannot expect to get the answer you want when you are being so disingenuous. n/t cynatnite Jun 2012 #83
I have no idea whether or not abortion is a constitutional right RZM Jun 2012 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please answer this questi...»Reply #23