Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeye_Democrat

(15,526 posts)
22. YES! Stop interviewing her! I sometimes think they do it just to pass...
Tue Jan 24, 2017, 12:07 PM
Jan 2017

the time in their program slots, though.

That's easier than real journalism, after all.

They might as well fill the time with cat videos, as far as I'm concerned.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm on board with it JustAnotherGen Jan 2017 #1
And that a hundred more ships marybourg Jan 2017 #34
Conjob should be the start. Ignore them all - boycott the SpicerLieFests NRaleighLiberal Jan 2017 #2
It's the job of the white house press corps leftynyc Jan 2017 #16
KremlinAnne's mic should be cut jeanmarc Jan 2017 #3
Press/media Boycott atreides1 Jan 2017 #4
Perhaps she can prerecord a 5 minute "deflection of the day" Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #5
Exactly right! world wide wally Jan 2017 #23
This is easy. If you want to hear lies..book her workinclasszero Jan 2017 #6
Anyone who interviews her should be prepared to call her out on her lies. Tanuki Jan 2017 #7
She thinks it's a "positive".. I call it bullshit. Cha Jan 2017 #8
The question is why did they let her rainy Jan 2017 #9
Les Moonves: Trump's run is 'damn good for CBS' workinclasszero Jan 2017 #15
No no no- Keep the spotlight on her n2doc Jan 2017 #10
Yep. The same with Comrade Spicer. GoCubsGo Jan 2017 #12
+1 nt Javaman Jan 2017 #20
ha ha - media networks pass up any chance at ratings and controversy? Not likely. jmg257 Jan 2017 #11
Everybody in Trumps Cabinet is polarizing including BLOTUS Stellar Jan 2017 #13
The sooner they muzzle her, the better. smirkymonkey Jan 2017 #14
NO, don't stop . . . OldRedneck Jan 2017 #17
+1 HopeAgain Jan 2017 #26
+2 Ligyron Jan 2017 #43
+3 llmart Jan 2017 #46
+4 Tree-Hugger Jan 2017 #47
I think that any reputable news organization would not have her on at all Bettie Jan 2017 #18
Trump seeks adulation, if we keep him from that he will go nuts and harm us greatly Eliot Rosewater Jan 2017 #30
Yeah, either way we are totally fucked Bettie Jan 2017 #48
FBI is now on board fully, denying there is any issue with Flynn and Russians. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2017 #49
And the CIA has a new guy in charge Bettie Jan 2017 #50
Yep, fascists win. Democracy and patriots lose. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2017 #51
I keep hoping to see a ray of hope Bettie Jan 2017 #59
I agree. No one should be listening to Conway and her 'alternative facts'. Turn it off. politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2017 #58
They should have stopped on the 20th, the Trump 'government' is not legitimate ck4829 Jan 2017 #19
Why do they have such a hard time treestar Jan 2017 #21
YES! Stop interviewing her! I sometimes think they do it just to pass... Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #22
I wonder if Les Moonves and his cohorts have considered the incredible ratings they would world wide wally Jan 2017 #24
Reminds me of this ProfessorPlum Jan 2017 #25
No Debate Necessary... LovingA2andMI Jan 2017 #27
An Easy Litmus Test for the Media... Blue Idaho Jan 2017 #28
The very first time she skirts around answering a question they should say "Since you won't answer appleannie1943 Jan 2017 #29
The media won't boycott her, her craziness is a ratings gold mine. cbdo2007 Jan 2017 #31
Yes. She's the new crazy trump, while he acts predidential.. lindysalsagal Jan 2017 #37
That's true - remember Orly Taitz and how her insanity was hard to miss? csziggy Jan 2017 #40
No News to be had ,,,, Cryptoad Jan 2017 #32
sunday she let the world know she deals in 'alternative facts' spanone Jan 2017 #33
I am 100% on board with this. BigDemVoter Jan 2017 #35
Has anyone else ever had a PR rep AND a WH spokesperson? underpants Jan 2017 #36
"when you are done listening to Kellyanne Conway, you probably understand less" IronLionZion Jan 2017 #38
Never happen. The press will converge on her like sharks on a feeding frenzy. procon Jan 2017 #39
But it's a media reality show spectacle! Ratings. The damn ratings! They need the ratings! ffr Jan 2017 #41
Why should networks help spread propaganda and lies? democrank Jan 2017 #42
They should hold her feet to the fire, make her answer directly or say goodbye. randr Jan 2017 #44
I'd rather see a mass exodus of journalists at Baghdad Sean's press conferences when he lies. Vinca Jan 2017 #45
I've said it for years zipplewrath Jan 2017 #52
If the MSM won't walk away from trump's liars, we should abandon the MSM. Paladin Jan 2017 #53
I ALMOST feel more sick to see and hear her than Trump. Doreen Jan 2017 #54
Every time she starts her Gish Gallop routine, cut the microphone. SeattleVet Jan 2017 #55
I like this approach. demmiblue Jan 2017 #60
Reporters - value truth?? - asiliveandbreathe Jan 2017 #56
I doubt MSM will stop interviewing Con-way; more likely, tRump will stop dealing with MSM... Eleanors38 Jan 2017 #57
Regardless, I'll never listen to her again. She belongs in a circus exhibit alongside trump. ecstatic Jan 2017 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Debate Over Whether Netwo...»Reply #22