Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHan

(10,173 posts)
22. Again..
Tue Jan 24, 2017, 11:58 PM
Jan 2017
"Tarrifs have failed according to who"


According to History.

And most recently Fareed Zakaria wrote a great piece about globalisation. I'll quote from him, because he assesses it well:

"It is much easier to rail against foreigners and promise to fight them with tariffs and fines. But the cost of addressing these problems at the global level is massive. The Economist reports, in a survey on globalization, that in 2009 the Obama administration punished China with a tariff on its tires. Two years later, the cost to U.S. consumers was $1.1 billion, or $900,000 for every job “saved.” The impact of such tariffs is usually felt disproportionately by the poor and middle class because they spend a larger share of their income on imported goods, such as food and clothing. That same Economist survey points to a study that calculated that, across 40 countries, if transnational trade ended, the wealthiest consumers would lose 28 percent of their purchasing power, but the poorest tenth would lose a staggering 63 percent."

Also: http://bigthink.com/cue-the-future/chinese-import-tariffs-are-a-bad-idea ( another example)

And in our history, the Smoot-Hawley Act was warning enough.

"By China's own numbers, pollution alone kills 1.5 million people in that nation every year. Climate change is going to cost a shit load more in damage and lives than that. "


Yes, China is a horrible polluter, and we just gave them the pacific void by abandoning the TPP where at least, countries in the region would be part of an agreement with provisions that aim to lift the floor of labor and environment standards - not perfect but a step in the right direction. We should not make perfect the enemy of good - Obama kept warning us and he was absolutely correct.

The TPP would have removed 18,000 tariffs. Removing tariffs increases the flow of trade for producers in all brackets - not just corporations but small businesses as well. In fact, the freeing up of tariffs in the TPP was drafted with small business in mind. If trade is freer, nations sell more stuff to each other, enabling them to meet costs and make profit.

The promise of 21st century civilization will not be protectionism. Archaic ideas and politics of nostalgia won't get us there - 21st century civilization will be global in scale and powered by renewable technologies. Our approach to trade must adapt to this reality else we'll get left out and become mired and trapped in archaic political "solutions".

EDIT: Regarding automation and our candidates bringing it up - a trade-obsessed narrative emerged during the election which was difficult to counter. It suited the campaigns of Sanders ( and Trump) but there are no legitimate excuses to ignore automation - there's a reticence, particularly from some on the left, to admit that automation is not the real problem. And I was proud and relieved that in the space of 20 years, we've had another great Democratic President who laid the foundation for the future and used his farewell address to point policy makers in the right direction.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The think is that... nycbos Jan 2017 #1
Throughout history, tyrants have been able to misdirect people's anger... Wounded Bear Jan 2017 #2
+++++ JHan Jan 2017 #8
When does Rollerball start? n/t Hestia Jan 2017 #3
it seems to me that in a sensible society, increasing automation would be a good thing anarch Jan 2017 #4
It isn't that automation is bad. In fact, in theory, destruction of the planet withstanding, this JCanete Jan 2017 #6
agreed: JHan Jan 2017 #9
Protectionism would have been good a long time ago, when we could have set labor standards JCanete Jan 2017 #5
Well we had an opportunity with the TPP... JHan Jan 2017 #12
The notion that TPP is good and that protectionism is bad, is predicated on assumptions that JCanete Jan 2017 #15
However... JHan Jan 2017 #16
there is a vast difference between expecting other countries to be as finicky? as us* JCanete Jan 2017 #17
You cannot make those kinds of judgments for other countries.. JHan Jan 2017 #18
I'm not sure how tarrifs would be lecturing. They would be much more about making us JCanete Jan 2017 #19
Tariffs have forever failed: JHan Jan 2017 #20
Tariffs have failed for who, when, how? How were they implemented and what was their intention? JCanete Jan 2017 #21
Again.. JHan Jan 2017 #22
unless you can demonstrate that language in the thing would have done something other than JCanete Jan 2017 #23
No trade agreement will be liked by everyone... JHan Jan 2017 #24
This is precisely what TPP was about. joshcryer Jan 2017 #7
Drumpfy can try to outlaw automation. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #10
Thank you for this, JH Cha Jan 2017 #11
Truck drivers, taxi, Uber, cashiers, fast food workers, who am I leaving out? sarcasmo Jan 2017 #13
Hedge Fund managers potentially... lol.. JHan Jan 2017 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama's warning...»Reply #22