Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
23. unless you can demonstrate that language in the thing would have done something other than
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 12:36 AM
Jan 2017

made us feel good, then it wasn't a good that the perfect was getting in the way of. It was just cover.

And we made China. We created that. They are a horrible polluter, and our way of life is even worse on the environment, even if our air and our rivers are better here at home. This deal might have hurt China's choke-hold on certain things, again, a dynamic we created because all we cared about was helping to make our corporations a boat load of money. It had nothing to do with lifting up the Chinese worker.

Your logic about tariffs could be applied to taxes at home. Reducing taxes on corporations frees up revenue for "small businesses" right?
The degree to which it supports big business is just so much more staggering. A small business may suddenly have competition in a market he didn't previously, because now that big corporation got such a huge tax cut that it can put even more into advertising, or undercut its competition far easier after expanding its reach into that small business's locality or niche. As you say, we have to look at history right? Well, when it comes to small businesses, what trends have you actually been seeing ? Do you really truly believe that small businesses are the ones who win from lower tariffs?

Fareed kicks off his argument with a lot of rhetoric that goes to the kind of racism and mistrust that might make attacking the TPP alluring to somebody like Trump. But that isn't the issue we have with the TPP on the left, and mixing that into the conversation is not helpful if he wants to refute the strongest criticisms rather than the lowest hanging fruit. Again, Fareed is pointing out that the poor displaced workers in this nation have to spend their money in places like Walmart, and that we would be hurting them if we didn't support trade deals that made products cheaper. Why can't you see that for the fallacious argument that it is? He uses one single product tariff as evidence...a tariff that was as disinterested in environmental costs as Fareed's own methodology. He is entirely externalizing the long-term costs. In fact, doing a search, he doesn't mention environment or pollution at any point. Also, wow...saying "if we applied tariffs to 1...1 country wtf...that wouldn't stop businesses from going to other countries. Well no shit Sherlock. How disingenuous can you get?

I don't think liberals are actually in opposition to trade agreements...we just haven't seen one we liked. And that isn't because we want perfect, it's because we think that as written, they are the enemy of the good.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The think is that... nycbos Jan 2017 #1
Throughout history, tyrants have been able to misdirect people's anger... Wounded Bear Jan 2017 #2
+++++ JHan Jan 2017 #8
When does Rollerball start? n/t Hestia Jan 2017 #3
it seems to me that in a sensible society, increasing automation would be a good thing anarch Jan 2017 #4
It isn't that automation is bad. In fact, in theory, destruction of the planet withstanding, this JCanete Jan 2017 #6
agreed: JHan Jan 2017 #9
Protectionism would have been good a long time ago, when we could have set labor standards JCanete Jan 2017 #5
Well we had an opportunity with the TPP... JHan Jan 2017 #12
The notion that TPP is good and that protectionism is bad, is predicated on assumptions that JCanete Jan 2017 #15
However... JHan Jan 2017 #16
there is a vast difference between expecting other countries to be as finicky? as us* JCanete Jan 2017 #17
You cannot make those kinds of judgments for other countries.. JHan Jan 2017 #18
I'm not sure how tarrifs would be lecturing. They would be much more about making us JCanete Jan 2017 #19
Tariffs have forever failed: JHan Jan 2017 #20
Tariffs have failed for who, when, how? How were they implemented and what was their intention? JCanete Jan 2017 #21
Again.. JHan Jan 2017 #22
unless you can demonstrate that language in the thing would have done something other than JCanete Jan 2017 #23
No trade agreement will be liked by everyone... JHan Jan 2017 #24
This is precisely what TPP was about. joshcryer Jan 2017 #7
Drumpfy can try to outlaw automation. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #10
Thank you for this, JH Cha Jan 2017 #11
Truck drivers, taxi, Uber, cashiers, fast food workers, who am I leaving out? sarcasmo Jan 2017 #13
Hedge Fund managers potentially... lol.. JHan Jan 2017 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama's warning...»Reply #23