Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Oh we have a madman in the presidency because the Democrats forced Hillary on us" [View all]JHan
(10,173 posts)24. I agree with most of your points except:
"It is very possibly true that Obama agreed to both make HRC SoS and his preferred successor to get support of both Clintons in 2008 and 2012"
that's not true. She wanted to return to the senate and aides from both the Clinton and Obama camp were against the idea of her being SoS.
Obama was a keen strategist, probably respected her, maybe felt she might primary him in 2012, and decided to bring her into cabinet. Everything I've read- that is credible- suggests Hillary wanted to just return to the Senate and become a Ted Kennedy type figure for Democrats.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Oh we have a madman in the presidency because the Democrats forced Hillary on us" [View all]
Fast Walker 52
Jan 2017
OP
Ironically, the very people saying that were the biggest Trump apologists during the election.
DanTex
Jan 2017
#2
The knee jerk reaction is to blame the media and the party. A complete madman was observed on
Trust Buster
Jan 2017
#3
Those 46% did not spring forth from a vacuum. There has been a 40 year plan to propagandize
yodermon
Jan 2017
#5
"The left has no such long term entrenched, organized propaganda campaign."
workinclasszero
Jan 2017
#39
Hillary lost against TRUMP. Do you think she would have won against Cruz? Rubio? Kasich?
yodermon
Jan 2017
#4
well, first, that is an old strategy, hardly unique to Hillary's campaign
Fast Walker 52
Jan 2017
#12
Derp. Because absolutely nothing interefered in this election on Trump's behalf.
JTFrog
Jan 2017
#14
I keep seeing this "Trump was the weakest possible candidate" nonsense from some Bernie supporters
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#45
yes, true, but I think the anti-Hillary demonization from the GOP could have been overcome
Fast Walker 52
Jan 2017
#10
Transparent bullshit. They can't handle the fact that they let their hate fuck the entire country.
JTFrog
Jan 2017
#11
Biographies I've read and accounts from those close to her suggest that she very much wanted to..
JHan
Jan 2017
#40
many of the same ones who want to minimize russian interference and don't give a shit about social
JI7
Jan 2017
#37
"Oh we have a madman in the presidency because the Democrats forced Hillary on us"
NCTraveler
Jan 2017
#38