Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Sean Spicer makes it official: No voter fraud in Philadelphia, Milwaukee or Detroit [View all]
Source: Washington Post
Sean Spicer makes it official: No voter fraud in Philadelphia, Milwaukee or Detroit
By David Weigel January 25 at 3:35 PM
For as long as Democrats were winning the Rust Belt in presidential elections, Republicans have been on the hunt for voter fraud in big cities. In 2012, when Pennsylvania Republicans passed a voter ID law, they explicitly said it would allow Mitt Romney to win the state by ending fraud in Philadelphia. When Wisconsin Republicans worried that they might lose a close Supreme Court race, they discussed messaging 'widespread reports of election fraud' so we are positively set up for the recount. When commentators defended President Trump's pre-election fear of fraud, the biggest Rust Belt cities made easy targets.
In 2012, there were "59 separate precincts in inner-city Philadelphia that Mitt Romney did not get a single vote, not one, Sean Hannity said last August. And according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, there were nine precincts in Cleveland alone, again, not a single Romney vote not one. Now, maybe I'm conspiratorial. Maybe this is a stretch. But 70 districts in two cities?
Good news, Midwest: According to the White House, there actually is no voter fraud in the Midwest or at least, not a significant amount specifically in the states where Trump competed and won. White House press secretary Sean Spicer said so during an exchange with Fox News reporter John Roberts, who brought up the fact that Trump's legal team had beaten back recount lawsuits in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by saying there had been no fraud.
Attorneys who were representing the president-elect during the recounts in several states emphatically stated, quote, 'All available evidence suggests the 2016 election was not tainted by fraud or mistake,' " Roberts said. So how do you square those two things?
Spicer said: I think there's a lot of states that we didn't compete in where that's not necessarily the case. You look at California and New York, I'm not sure that those statements were we didn't look at those two states, in particular. ...
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By David Weigel January 25 at 3:35 PM
For as long as Democrats were winning the Rust Belt in presidential elections, Republicans have been on the hunt for voter fraud in big cities. In 2012, when Pennsylvania Republicans passed a voter ID law, they explicitly said it would allow Mitt Romney to win the state by ending fraud in Philadelphia. When Wisconsin Republicans worried that they might lose a close Supreme Court race, they discussed messaging 'widespread reports of election fraud' so we are positively set up for the recount. When commentators defended President Trump's pre-election fear of fraud, the biggest Rust Belt cities made easy targets.
In 2012, there were "59 separate precincts in inner-city Philadelphia that Mitt Romney did not get a single vote, not one, Sean Hannity said last August. And according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, there were nine precincts in Cleveland alone, again, not a single Romney vote not one. Now, maybe I'm conspiratorial. Maybe this is a stretch. But 70 districts in two cities?
Good news, Midwest: According to the White House, there actually is no voter fraud in the Midwest or at least, not a significant amount specifically in the states where Trump competed and won. White House press secretary Sean Spicer said so during an exchange with Fox News reporter John Roberts, who brought up the fact that Trump's legal team had beaten back recount lawsuits in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by saying there had been no fraud.
Attorneys who were representing the president-elect during the recounts in several states emphatically stated, quote, 'All available evidence suggests the 2016 election was not tainted by fraud or mistake,' " Roberts said. So how do you square those two things?
Spicer said: I think there's a lot of states that we didn't compete in where that's not necessarily the case. You look at California and New York, I'm not sure that those statements were we didn't look at those two states, in particular. ...
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/25/sean-spicer-makes-it-official-no-voter-fraud-in-philadelphia-milwaukee-or-detroit/?utm_term=.9f069e66d374
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sean Spicer makes it official: No voter fraud in Philadelphia, Milwaukee or Detroit [View all]
Eugene
Jan 2017
OP
Voter fraud only occurred in states where the short fingered vulgar buffoon lost
etherealtruth
Jan 2017
#1
So... those are the cities we should look at for Trump tampered votes against Hillary then?
Lucinda
Jan 2017
#3
Meaning if we audit we will find that votes were not counted in those places that tended to
kimbutgar
Jan 2017
#14