Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm sick of being told that I don't like Tulsi because she supported Bernie. [View all]LiberalLovinLug
(14,689 posts)30. Another party purity test
And how has this kind of strategy worked for us so far?
There were very good proven reasons to distrust the DNC and Devious Debbie and her dismal record of re-electing Democrats. I'm not going to rehash all that.
And the Democrats have also been caught up in PC hand-wringing for too long about the threat of terrorism and linking it to a specific religion. A religion that teaches its followers that its ok to kill non-believers. A whopping 60% of those in moderate Muslim countries believe that the death penalty is perfectly fine for that "crime". Religion is a festering sore on society, and the Islamic religion is the most insidiously dangerous of the lot because it is set up as the perfect base to build a radical violent opposition to liberalism around the world. I'm with Bill Maher on this. Of course the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and don't want trouble. And of course Trump is going way too far the other way with an outright ban. But Democrats have disregarded the angst in society about Islamic religion influenced radicals, whether it is overblown or not.
Obama made a mistake in Syria. He's a nice guy and just wanted to avoid conflict. (As was his tactic too often with the hostile GOP houses as well.) He withdrew and Russia stepped into the void and now has the greater influence and power. Hillary Clinton criticized Obama for his refusal to implement a no-fly zone in Syria. I'm sure Hillary and Tulsi would agree on a lot of things in that area.
And an assault weapons ban? Sure we'd love to see that again, but one has to pick ones battles at the right time.
She is a progressive on the issues that matter such as SS, civil rights, and the economy :
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Tulsi_Gabbard.htm
This kind of self-immolation nit picking will get us nowhere.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sick of being told that I don't like Tulsi because she supported Bernie. [View all]
La Lioness Priyanka
Jan 2017
OP
people use mental shortcuts to make decisions, so they think Tulsi represents the left because she
La Lioness Priyanka
Jan 2017
#2
I don't think you are rehashing the primaries and disliking Tulsi for that reason
Tom Rinaldo
Jan 2017
#5
I am far less critical of "conservative" Dems that represent conservative (republican districts)
etherealtruth
Jan 2017
#7
i am completely with you. if she was representing staten island, i'd get it
La Lioness Priyanka
Jan 2017
#8
I wish people would simply look at her record ... they scream bloody murder about ...
etherealtruth
Jan 2017
#9
Read the Progressive Punch list. She's #137 in rank, just to make it easier to find her. She earned
mahina
Jan 2017
#19
I've long held the belief that some republicans register and run as Dems to get into office
justiceischeap
Jan 2017
#24
Although in a fight to control the House, the "D" becomes as important as the person. nt
7962
Jan 2017
#25
As long as you make OPs that lead with primary war issues you are promoting primary wars
aikoaiko
Jan 2017
#42
I think making the topic into an OP elevates it to continuing the primary wars
aikoaiko
Jan 2017
#62