Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(89,896 posts)
38. Remember, YOU are THEIR employer. Would they defy their boss in any other job?
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 03:58 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Sat Jan 28, 2017, 05:35 PM - Edit history (4)

Probably not, unless they're stupid and masochistic and don't pay attention and just react at the gut level and ...

Oh, never mind.


Reading the Indivisible Guide ( https://www.indivisibleguide.com ) taught me the importance of focusing on YOUR own "big three" - YOUR two Senators and YOUR Congresscritter. HOWEVER...

I've always believed that you make noise wherever you think it can be heard. YES focus on YOUR reps. But I'd submit that it's also valuable to spread that a little. And I go ahead and call somebody else. For example, Ted Lieu's my Congressman (Glory Hallelujah!) but there's also the next door guy, Brad Sherman, into whose district I may go on, either on a daily basis, or perhaps 3 - 5 days a week. I spend money there. I fill my gas tank there. Our son now lives out there. (HEY! THERE'S a hook, right there!) Our daughter lives in another state - but we visit there and go out to eat and spend money and rent a car and fill the gas tank and visit the local stores and sights, when we're there to hang out with her. So that tells me I have an interest in contacting THOSE reps THERE, also.

FURTHER:
(And I'll use the hapless Heidi Heitkamp as an example.) She's a Senator from North Dakota. Purportedly a Dem, although from some of her votes, I'm not convinced of that. I live in California. I don't know anybody in North Dakota (except for when my son and his band were touring through there and did business there and I was dealing with the local promoters and such). Hmmm - another reason to call the reps there including her.

HOWEVER - when she was first running for the Senate, I responded to a campaign email to send her a donation. I did that a few times. Just a small donation, but it WAS a financial donation. I sent her money. She won. Yay! But then I started to realize she's a DINO on some things - like that horrible time immediately after the Newtown massacre of little innocent school children. She went on "Good Morning America" either the next day or two days after, to assert that there was no way she was going to support restrictions on the right to own massacre machines (some people call them assault rifles or automatic rifles. I call them massacre machines). I called her office and gave 'em hell. BUT FIRST, I told them that yes, I'm not from North Dakota, I'm from California. BUT: when she was campaigning for this job she now has, she was VERY happy to take MY CALIFORNIA MONEY for her campaign. She sure didn't turn my donation away because I wasn't from her state. Neither did her campaign people. They wanted it and were very glad to get it. So yes, in that respect, she works for ME, TOO. And I SAID THAT to the staffer who took my call. I helped her win that Senate seat. So that entitles me to ownership of a little bit of that. I thereby own a piece of it, however small. AS a donor - a financial underwriter of her campaign. I thereby own a piece of that.

Same thing for Joe Manchin from West Virginia. I sent him money, too, when he was first running for the Senate. I won't make that mistake again. AND, FURTHERMORE, next time the opportunity presents itself, I plan to call his office and point out that I was a campaign contributor, AND add that I won't be making THAT mistake anymore.

I had an abrupt tutorial in that whole aspect of out-of-state contacts when I called Susan Collins' office years ago. And I was rudely told by the staffer taking my call: "and WHAT does this have to do with the State of Maine?" THAT kind of situation is where you butt in with "my niece and her family live there and I visit her frequently, and spend money there and support the local economy several times a year, so I have a direct personal interest in the State of Maine that I care about a LOT." That kinda shuts 'em up.

If you have relatives in another state, if you have business interests there, if you own property there, ANY reasons to show how you have a personal connection there, I'd recommend exploiting that fact whenever you interface with the representative class. They may technically not represent you directly, but indirectly? That's quite another matter entirely.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick. This is why we ALL need to march on April 15, the "Show us your taxes, Trump!" day. Squinch Jan 2017 #1
Agree. eom dae Jan 2017 #7
The petition for Donald to release his taxes is up to 405,370 signatures. briv1016 Jan 2017 #15
We need impeachment now. We might not make it to April 15th. Initech Jan 2017 #18
The more information we get about his conflicts of interest, the sooner we can impeach. Squinch Jan 2017 #20
This probably seems like a dumb question, but is their a site with info? manicraven Jan 2017 #29
http://investigatingtrump.com Eyeball_Kid Jan 2017 #32
Boom! This is another reason for the emoluments clause. elehhhhna Jan 2017 #2
Mr. President... Turbineguy Jan 2017 #3
Now that is a good idea. pangaia Jan 2017 #4
Call him the "unprecedent." nt tblue37 Jan 2017 #12
Mr. peeResident n/t Fritz Walter Jan 2017 #21
I'm never going to refer to him by anything but "Trump." maddiemom Jan 2017 #58
And besides, Bannon performs the policy duties neeksgeek Jan 2017 #59
Does it really make a difference, at this point? Ajji11 Jan 2017 #5
You kill his presidency through a thousand cuts. TranssexualKaren Jan 2017 #25
No, they haven't ignored them. blue neen Jan 2017 #34
Welcome to DU, Ajji11! calimary Jan 2017 #35
The reality is they govern by consent Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #53
Is the media all over this? treestar Jan 2017 #6
I'm watching a piece on it on CNN right now. TranssexualKaren Jan 2017 #26
Besides these, why did he leave out Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia, etc? mainer Jan 2017 #8
I couldn't figure out Pakistan or Afghanistan LeftInTX Jan 2017 #39
I found out Trump biz is trying to get in to Pakistan mainer Jan 2017 #40
Well duh Generator Jan 2017 #9
And in other news... SHRED Jan 2017 #10
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jan 2017 #11
That was obvious from the get go MrScorpio Jan 2017 #13
If that is the reason, I wonder if there is any evidence of collusion with Trump Inc. tanyev Jan 2017 #14
This might not be as bad as it looks. E.A.B. Jan 2017 #16
I disagree. It's worse than it looks. Vinca Jan 2017 #17
If only politicians were honest..... TranssexualKaren Jan 2017 #27
Welcome to U, TranssexualKaren! calimary Jan 2017 #37
This is so stupid!!! logosoco Jan 2017 #19
I had my eyes opened a couple days ago... llmart Jan 2017 #28
"Well I don't really know much about how government works anyway" logosoco Jan 2017 #31
So true. llmart Jan 2017 #36
Remember, YOU are THEIR employer. Would they defy their boss in any other job? calimary Jan 2017 #38
Very good point. I had not thought of that. logosoco Jan 2017 #41
One other thing - the staffers frequently ask for zip codes where you're calling from. calimary Jan 2017 #42
You should make this a whole new thread! logosoco Jan 2017 #43
Okay. I shall do that. Thanks! calimary Jan 2017 #45
Why do you talk to this person? n/t MrModerate Jan 2017 #54
Good question. llmart Jan 2017 #55
I had a discussion last week with a woman ET Awful Jan 2017 #56
This is what we're up against... llmart Jan 2017 #57
They're PROUD of their ignorance. hunter Jan 2017 #60
Oh, I agree... llmart Jan 2017 #61
Yup TexasBushwhacker Jan 2017 #22
kick for exposure...also rec.. Stuart G Jan 2017 #23
Duh! malaise Jan 2017 #24
just fuck this guy.... dhill926 Jan 2017 #30
Once confiscation of Iraqi oil starts there will be no friends left in Iraq. gordianot Jan 2017 #33
I already saw an article saying Iraqi troops feel "betrayed" by what Trump has done Takket Jan 2017 #47
More evidence for his future impeachment - and it's gonna pile up n/t RiverStone Jan 2017 #44
This should be grounds for impeachment under the emoluments clause Takket Jan 2017 #46
Amen colsohlibgal Jan 2017 #48
Follow the money. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2017 #49
this is a HUGE part of the story JI7 Jan 2017 #50
Simplified, please share... True Dough Jan 2017 #51
Surprise, surprise, surprise... Wounded Bear Jan 2017 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Trump's busines...»Reply #38