Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,907 posts)

2. Not to mention Pakistan, where that other son of SA, OBL, was sheltered..

Sat Jan 28, 2017, 06:49 PM

Jan 2017

It seems to me that the 'limited' scope of the EO is a direct argument against their claim that it's needed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump claims it's not a Muslim ban and he's right. [View all] Kablooie Jan 2017 OP

Well, he DOES do business there. So there is that. pangaia Jan 2017 #1

Yes and it's more ammo for his violation of the Emoluments clause Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2017 #6

Not to mention Pakistan, where that other son of SA, OBL, was sheltered.. Princess Turandot Jan 2017 #2

and they probably hold the mortgages to his hotels. putitinD Jan 2017 #3

Clear warning central scrutinizer Jan 2017 #4