Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ilsa

(64,371 posts)
68. That's overboard for a product
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 05:25 PM
Jun 2012

like that. A note from the parent should be all that is required.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sunburn is the white man's burden XemaSab Jun 2012 #1
another racial stereotype rears its head. nt msongs Jun 2012 #13
You're saying it is a "racial stereotype" to think that pnwmom Jun 2012 #18
Darker skinned people should NOT blow off skin cancer eridani Jun 2012 #72
No one said they should. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #73
A teacher should have sent the child to the Ilsa Jun 2012 #2
The problem is, the district WAS treating sunscreen like a medication, pnwmom Jun 2012 #9
That's overboard for a product Ilsa Jun 2012 #68
It hurts to look at those children. PDJane Jun 2012 #3
I've had that kind of burn, too, back when they didn't have good sunscreens. pnwmom Jun 2012 #10
Sue them, and let them learn what a liability issue is really all about. Liberty Belle Jun 2012 #4
I think at least it would rise to the level of neglect, pnwmom Jun 2012 #16
We had a lengthy discussion on Facebook about this the other day proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #5
I'm not following you XemaSab Jun 2012 #6
The school will make sure they put on sunscreen if mom sends it to school. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #8
That is NOT true! The school required a doctor's note for the child to bring her OWN sunscreen pnwmom Jun 2012 #14
She was on a 504. The parent signs off on a 504. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #17
The district has already acknowledged that their policy was wrong, and it will be changed pnwmom Jun 2012 #21
I'm not defending the district. I've said many times already they were wrong. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #25
It was raining all morning. And the mother wasn't clear about what Field Day was, because pnwmom Jun 2012 #32
"Everyone's at fault!" Scootaloo Jun 2012 #36
Apparently she didn't know - it was rainy in the morning TBF Jun 2012 #88
In our latitude at this time of year, too much sun is rarely a problem -- at least pnwmom Jun 2012 #24
If someone has albinism, too much sun is *always* a problem. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #48
Not apparently for this girl. Whatever form of albinism she has hasn't pnwmom Jun 2012 #49
Yes, apparently, for this girl, or else we wouldn't be having this discussion. God. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #53
We are saying two different things. pnwmom Jun 2012 #54
The children should have been kept at home or indoors lapislzi Jun 2012 #43
The mother didn't know about the sunscreen policy or what Field Day entailed.n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #50
Common sense is notably absent. lapislzi Jun 2012 #55
I have to believe you, but... lapislzi Jun 2012 #69
No, the school required a doctor's prescription in order for the child to bring her own sunscreen. pnwmom Jun 2012 #12
And the mom knew that. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #19
Wrong. The mother wasn't informed about the need for a doctor's note pnwmom Jun 2012 #22
She was on a 504 because of her sun allergies. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #26
Yeah, right. Except you weren't there and you haven't read the 504. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #87
That's not at issue. lapislzi Jun 2012 #51
The mother didn't know that a note from the doctor was required. pnwmom Jun 2012 #52
The children are 9 and 11. lapislzi Jun 2012 #56
The school district's policy was that a child couldn't self-apply sunscreen pnwmom Jun 2012 #75
I'm not arguing with you that the policy is dumb. It is totally dumb. lapislzi Jun 2012 #80
But the individual mother's mistake doesn't affect anyone but her family. The state's policy, pnwmom Jun 2012 #81
Ah. Well, that is a reasonable discussion. lapislzi Jun 2012 #83
Chapstick! That's a great example. pnwmom Jun 2012 #86
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jun 2012 #7
At least one of these girls was on a 504 proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #11
Did you read her blog? The policy prevented the girls from applying their OWN sunscreen pnwmom Jun 2012 #15
The child was so sun allergic she was on a 504 proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #20
SHE DIDN'T KNOW THE POLICY REQUIRED A DOCTOR'S NOTE. pnwmom Jun 2012 #23
That's baloney. Every school on the planet sends home a list of school policies. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #27
delete -- dupe. pnwmom Jun 2012 #30
You are making this up. You don't know what is in the 504. You don't know that the need for the note pnwmom Jun 2012 #31
I write 504s. I know exactly what goes in them. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #33
Do you write them in that school in that Tacoma district? You have no idea pnwmom Jun 2012 #37
She has severe sun allergies. What do you THINK was in her 504? proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #42
You are hell bent on defending the school district even though they've apologized pnwmom Jun 2012 #44
That other poster is absolutely blaming BOTH the parent and the school. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #82
Please point to a statement in any article that the mother did not send sunscreen with the girl. pnwmom Jun 2012 #89
You answered your own question. lapislzi Jun 2012 #58
I know that my own children were reluctant to be singled out for special treatment, pnwmom Jun 2012 #60
Or to take the child indoors! lapislzi Jun 2012 #45
If the student was on a 504 Sgent Jun 2012 #29
How do you know the school never requested it! proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #34
You don't understand the weather around here. Sun usually isn't a problem at this time pnwmom Jun 2012 #46
That's insane. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #28
They're scared of lawsuits because parents threaten to file them. proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #35
Have you ever once heard of a lawsuit filed by a parent because pnwmom Jun 2012 #38
people file lawsuits about lots of things that get laughed out of court. but even to get to court HiPointDem Jun 2012 #39
School district policies shouldn't be driven by sheer paranoia. pnwmom Jun 2012 #40
hmm. as i understood it, your children don't go to public schools. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #41
They each spent between 6 - 9 years in the public schools. pnwmom Jun 2012 #47
hmm. your posts don't seem to reflect that. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #59
Have you been stalking me? pnwmom Jun 2012 #61
that's because i haven't been stalking you. i just noticed you're often found in teacher-bashing HiPointDem Jun 2012 #62
You haven't been paying attention to the many posts I've made supporting pnwmom Jun 2012 #63
maybe not. i will in the future. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #65
I don't know...sunscreen's like poison... Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #57
Some are better than others. But it's still up to the parents to decide -- or it should be. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #64
If it was anything else, I would agree. Guess just pet peeve how people blindly slather Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #74
It's only school policy because it's state law B2G Jun 2012 #66
No, it's not. pnwmom Jun 2012 #76
so many things don't make sense here ctaylors6 Jun 2012 #67
All of your questions are excellent ones. pnwmom Jun 2012 #77
Why did the mom not call this to the school's attention before Field Day? revolution breeze Jun 2012 #70
She did. But she didn't know that Field Day meant being outside all day, pnwmom Jun 2012 #71
It's Washington revolution breeze Jun 2012 #78
This mother should not have had to send a doctor's note for sunscreen. It was a dumb policy, pnwmom Jun 2012 #79
This mother is an idiot... joeybee12 Jun 2012 #84
Doesn't everyone need sunscreen in those conditions Nikia Jun 2012 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another idiotic school po...»Reply #68