Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Vote Against FDR in '44 [View all]"The rest of the historical parallel you're trying to draw isn't much more accurate."
..., you're right. NDAA, doesn't do this: "It allows for the indefinite detention of US citizens by the military inside the US - without a trial."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100248562
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There may have been instances where US Citizens were killed by US forces as enemycombatants in WWII,
leveymg
Dec 2011
#6
I'm making a larger point about how the GWOT is dissimiliar to the methods used by the US in WWII
leveymg
Dec 2011
#9
Yes, Obama's authorized extrajudicial executions. A number of them. That's a major dissimilarity.
leveymg
Dec 2011
#14
If Republicans can animate a block of marble like Mitt Romney, we can zombify FDR.
Bucky
Dec 2011
#34
You're right. FDR had vast majorities in Congress. Obama has had to fight much harder for everything
MjolnirTime
Dec 2011
#32
The was never an actual functioning majority in the Senate, and that made all the difference.
MjolnirTime
Dec 2011
#41
He did dump that left wing Henry Wallace in '44 for that moderate Harry Truman!!
WI_DEM
Dec 2011
#31
Logic isn't going to get you anywhere with someone who'd use this "argument."
JackRiddler
Dec 2011
#46
Still, it's silly to compare Obama after one term to all that FDR had done after three.
Ken Burch
Jan 2012
#63