Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why? Because some of us do not believe the comipinko Dec 2011 #1
I'd have to say theaocp Dec 2011 #2
Fine. Go try to elect Dennis Kucinich in Nebraska. TheWraith Dec 2011 #3
Are you suggesting... kentuck Dec 2011 #7
I love it when somebody says "Are you suggesting?" dems_rightnow Dec 2011 #81
Yeah, isn't that great? kentuck Dec 2011 #94
This is one that the left should be called out on treestar Dec 2011 #12
A totally dishonest misrepresentation... kentuck Dec 2011 #20
It doesn't matter about the majority in the country treestar Dec 2011 #26
+1000. If there's a groundswell of Progressive activism waiting to be tapped, CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #28
So you believe the majority of the country is conservative? kentuck Dec 2011 #32
Why keep going on about the majority in the country? treestar Dec 2011 #54
That may be true with the Senate but not necessarily the House or the Presidency. kentuck Dec 2011 #59
Treestar, you're on a roll. And I agree, it's time to "put up or shut up" for good! This is that.. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #90
Baloney. kentuck Dec 2011 #92
If you truly believe that, why should "Democrats" have to find a better candidate? This is an..... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #95
I think it is a totally false premise. kentuck Dec 2011 #97
Serious question? Does your screenname indicate that you're a "Kentuckian"? Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #101
oh no you didn't.... dionysus Dec 2011 #151
Do you intend just to ignore my query in post #101? I mean, I understand why you would.... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #127
So progressives should be able to find someone among the nearly 2,000,000 people who live in NE Telly Savalas Dec 2011 #157
Let's see.... the least likely scenario in the nation proves your point? FredStembottom Dec 2011 #129
By golly, here's a brand new link about where such things might be possible! FredStembottom Dec 2011 #130
Never in opposition to electing more progressives. However, did you actually read the o.p.? Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #133
Rather than "win anywhere" the OP seemes to be talking about a simple majority... FredStembottom Dec 2011 #134
Another thought ... oldhippie Dec 2011 #142
"Maybe people lie to pollsters?" Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #143
You answer your own question. FredStembottom Dec 2011 #160
I "cited" the reasons "liberals" give for not breaking through. I say pish-tosh. The o.p. seems to Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #161
I guess what I am saying is..... FredStembottom Jan 2012 #165
Not really concerned about "how I come across to you". That, notwithstanding, I am an..... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #166
Excellent! FredStembottom Jan 2012 #167
I knew we'd get there. But we certainly didn't solve the matter set out in the o.p. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #170
why, them's figtin woids! BOTFUT is gonna show you who can win nebraska, but good! dionysus Dec 2011 #150
LOL. They better get to work, because I am a non-believer. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #162
No, but they think they are based on what the media tells them. n/t Scuba Dec 2011 #78
Absolutely treestar Dec 2011 #55
With the assumption that the Blue Dog Democrat is better than any Republican... kentuck Dec 2011 #30
I agree, but DonCoquixote Dec 2011 #110
Since The Majority comes with things like Committee Chairmanships, and control annabanana Dec 2011 #111
Well said...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #122
You're changing the subject. I AM fighting the Warren in Massachusetts. bluestate10 Dec 2011 #80
Repeat the Big Lie! CANDO Dec 2011 #138
Excellent post. bluestate10 Dec 2011 #75
A "flaming liberal"? kentuck Dec 2011 #82
Yeah, a Moderate. See my other posts. nt bluestate10 Dec 2011 #85
I imagine voting one's convictions is rather more important than voting for political realities LanternWaste Dec 2011 #22
for the win frylock Dec 2011 #71
because most say they want to balance the federal budget lovemydog Dec 2011 #4
And the worst is that these same Republicans in Democratic clothing JDPriestly Dec 2011 #5
What do I need to say to get elected? Ezlivin Dec 2011 #6
DNC chooses the candidates librechik Dec 2011 #8
Bingo! Wind Dancer Dec 2011 #37
Primaries decide candidates. bluestate10 Dec 2011 #83
Why do you hate Dennis so? kentuck Dec 2011 #86
Why? 99Forever Dec 2011 #9
Except most people believe in liberal policy edhopper Dec 2011 #10
That is not entirely true. MakingSense Dec 2011 #140
I said taxes on the rich. edhopper Dec 2011 #148
We all wish that was true MakingSense Dec 2011 #155
Thanks for the thoughtful response. edhopper Dec 2011 #158
You're overlooking that the elections are by state treestar Dec 2011 #11
States have voters... kentuck Dec 2011 #13
The elections are by the state treestar Dec 2011 #15
You mean like Bob Kerry? kentuck Dec 2011 #17
I don't know if the left considers him progressive enough treestar Dec 2011 #40
He was the Governor and Senator from that state already... kentuck Dec 2011 #42
HA! Charlemagne Dec 2011 #91
Liberals can't win a seat in every district etherealtruth Dec 2011 #14
My take surfdog Dec 2011 #16
Therefore.... kentuck Dec 2011 #19
Perhaps surfdog Dec 2011 #21
Therefore.... kentuck Dec 2011 #23
What I'm saying is surfdog Dec 2011 #53
Maybe? kentuck Dec 2011 #60
Relative to precisely which voting bloc? LanternWaste Dec 2011 #24
why do you keep saying that? it's a total strawman.the majority of red state voters are conservative dionysus Dec 2011 #152
So you agree? kentuck Dec 2011 #153
there are conservative areas of the country where liberal ideas can't currently win. while the GOP dionysus Dec 2011 #154
I think the "dennis kucinich types" have mostly been defined by the right-wing media... kentuck Dec 2011 #156
anyone who thinks conservatives have better ideas hasn't watched the debates spanone Dec 2011 #18
Under that reasoning, Obama must not watch such debates. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #33
That's correct sandyd921 Dec 2011 #25
That's correct kentuck Dec 2011 #27
I'm just a bit stunned that so many here sandyd921 Dec 2011 #64
I agree... n/t kentuck Dec 2011 #66
+1 mike_c Dec 2011 #70
There really is no such thing as an American conservative Major Nikon Dec 2011 #102
Why? 1. It is profitable for the DLC and its supporters. 2. Some people are nonthinking parrots. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2011 #29
You'll have to ask our corporate media..... FrenchieCat Dec 2011 #31
You are very close to the truth, FrenchieCat... kentuck Dec 2011 #34
Most likely so.....in particular those "Moderate" Democrats you are discussing..... FrenchieCat Dec 2011 #47
"conservatism is sold hard" kentuck Dec 2011 #52
So what do we do about that? FrenchieCat Dec 2011 #72
Step One: kentuck Dec 2011 #79
"It is better to fight and lose than compromising your principles......" FrenchieCat Dec 2011 #100
^^^ This ^^^! And that's all she wrote. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #118
This entire argument about Nelson is missing the point liskddksil Dec 2011 #35
It depends on the state involved. moriah Dec 2011 #36
Wasn't J William Fulbright from Arkansas? kentuck Dec 2011 #38
Fullbright was a mixed bag etherealtruth Dec 2011 #43
He was also an ardent segregationist MFrohike Dec 2011 #44
And later they gave us Bill Clinton... kentuck Dec 2011 #45
Hahaha MFrohike Dec 2011 #51
You are right to a point LiberalFighter Dec 2011 #39
Are you claiming voters don't know their own minds treestar Dec 2011 #41
actually a majority isn't enough anymore Enrique Dec 2011 #46
We could have a 99% majority and it wouldn't matter... kentuck Dec 2011 #48
Well, IMO, there is a certain logic in believing that a real progressive/liberal will probably not Zorra Dec 2011 #49
My issue MFrohike Dec 2011 #50
Well said... kentuck Dec 2011 #56
Funny thought MFrohike Dec 2011 #113
The two parties claim lovemydog Dec 2011 #57
Progressive Democrats can, though. The problem with Liberals is that ... T S Justly Dec 2011 #58
Exactly. It was Howard Dean's 50 state strategy that helped get O. elected. bbgrunt Dec 2011 #61
A Fire Breathing Populist Democrat, bvar22 Dec 2011 #62
Elizabeth Warren is from O-K-L-A-H-O-M-A! PassingFair Dec 2011 #76
That is EXACTLY right Bvar socialist_n_TN Dec 2011 #106
How many existing Senators do you think are liberal? karynnj Dec 2011 #63
we need to learn to rule with a minority like the thugs do spanone Dec 2011 #65
I believe that Progressives can win a majority. BUT I also think that politics is local. Each state jwirr Dec 2011 #67
How is it that one of the most liberal Senators, Tom Harkin.... kentuck Dec 2011 #73
I used Iowa because it used to be very rethug. Since the McGovern race some very good Democrats jwirr Dec 2011 #93
I tend to think... kentuck Dec 2011 #96
I agree with that and I think that may be the only way we replace Nelson with someone who is jwirr Dec 2011 #103
You keep repeating that, but you didn't answer my question about KY. You're represented.... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2011 #119
You're talking about molding people treestar Dec 2011 #136
Have you ever heard of Senator Frank Church? Major Hogwash Dec 2011 #131
Oh yes but those days have been gone a long time. He was good and I do remember him well. He jwirr Dec 2011 #145
Church served until 1981. It could happen again, a Democrat Senator from Idaho. Major Hogwash Dec 2011 #146
Oh don't get me wrong I completely believe we need to maintain the 50 state campaign. And I will jwirr Dec 2011 #147
Majority of Americans are liberal. Majority of the SENATE is conservative Eliminator Dec 2011 #68
Because that narrative supports the "Third Way." All the corporate money, none of the guilt. DirkGently Dec 2011 #69
For almost four decades now . . . Brigid Dec 2011 #74
yes it's exactly true. n/t. okieinpain Dec 2011 #77
I believe that its up to the voters and if they dont want a very liberal majority then it wont cstanleytech Dec 2011 #84
"Goodbye, baseball!" RUMMYisFROSTED Dec 2011 #87
Read it more closely Rummy... kentuck Dec 2011 #88
...and the ball is touched by Steve Bartman! RUMMYisFROSTED Dec 2011 #123
Liberals dont win Charlemagne Dec 2011 #89
The reason is that the conservatives have a massive, effective propaganda machine. Kablooie Dec 2011 #98
+1 kentuck Dec 2011 #99
The OWS say it is not political...... FrenchieCat Dec 2011 #105
OWS can not support candidates who are opposed to equality for some people. Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #107
Well said, as usual. Major Hogwash Dec 2011 #109
America IS profoundly conservative. Orsino Dec 2011 #104
What Orsino said. n/t Basic LA Dec 2011 #115
SOME PARTS of America are profoundly conservative. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #116
It's more granular even than that... Orsino Dec 2011 #126
Our corporate media have told the American people that Obama is as liberal as it is possible to be Lydia Leftcoast Dec 2011 #108
Not historically accurate. Bucky Dec 2011 #112
Is that you, Rahm? Odin2005 Dec 2011 #114
When have liberals ever really had a majority in this country? Hippo_Tron Dec 2011 #117
Liberals can not win a majority.... unkachuck Dec 2011 #120
Can a liberal win Ben Nelson's seat?...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #121
They have a better grasp on red meat messaging tavalon Dec 2011 #124
Even when Democrats have control it is hard for them to accomplish avebury Dec 2011 #125
Kucinich will never be President. MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #128
no it isn't true, we just had 60 Senate seats a couple years ago Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #132
And that included Lieberman, Blue Dogs treestar Dec 2011 #135
agreed, but they voted for Reid Motown_Johnny Dec 2011 #144
Unfortunately, that provides an excuse for the Democrats to move further right. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #137
Money, money, money.... WCGreen Dec 2011 #139
I don't know about that. I think left-of-center describes the majority of people in this country. Tatiana Dec 2011 #141
more like "Liberals cannot win a majority in red states until you change the conservative mindset dionysus Dec 2011 #149
because party leaders have dialed more getdown Dec 2011 #159
Because working class Americans in the heartland stand in solidarity with the Wall Street bankers. Douglas Carpenter Dec 2011 #163
The audacity of the lie is especially evident during election season, woo me with science Dec 2011 #164
Because the party messaging says so. mmonk Jan 2012 #168
I for one, cheered when I heard he was leaving. JerseygirlCT Jan 2012 #169
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Liberals cannot win a maj...»Reply #130