Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)

3. And with strong unions

Reply to NNN0LHI (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 25, 2012, 09:25 PM

Jun 2012

Both would have been doing it, which I don't agree with either.

I'm all for strong unions, but because they're good for workers, not because I want them to pour unlimited money into elections.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If unions had the membership to pour unlimited funds into elections wouldn't be any Citizens United [View all] NNN0LHI Jun 2012 OP

I don't want to see any entity have the ability to pour unlimited funds into elections n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #1

Thank you for making my point NNN0LHI Jun 2012 #2

And with strong unions SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2012 #3

Did you read my original post? NNN0LHI Jun 2012 #4