Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,903 posts)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 09:20 AM Jan 2017

Traitor Trump didn't realize Steve Bannon needs Senate confirmation for NSC [View all]

When Donald Trump decided that fake-news publisher and alt-right nazi Steve Bannon would be his White House Chief Strategist, he presumably chose that role so that the overwhelmingly controversial Bannon wouldn’t have to go through Senate confirmation hearings, which would have been a firestorm for the ages. But now that Trump has subsequently also picked Bannon for the National Security Council, it turns out he’ll be unwittingly feeding Bannon to the Senate wolves after all.

According to section (a)(6) of federal statute 50 U.S. Code 3021, a civilian like Steve Bannon will in fact need to go through Senate confirmation and approval in order to serve on the National Security Council because he doesn’t fit into any of the five listed pre-approved categories. That obscure law, which has remained obscure because no president has ever tried to put a political hack on the NSC until now, was dug up by MSNBC analyst Jonathan Alter late on Monday night. This sets up a remarkable showdown if Trump goes ahead with the Bannon pick, because few in either party have shown any affinity or trust for the guy – and they’ll have limitless material for embarrassing him.



If Bannon goes through a Senate confirmation, it will give Senators the opportunity to grill him about his former role running fake-news white nationalist site Breitbart, and the chance to hammer him about the allegations that he beat his wife. And it will pull back the curtain on the mysterious Bannon, who is believed to be acting as de facto president in the Trump administration. If all 48 Democrats vote against him, it will require just three Republicans to do the same. Considering just how deeply Bannon is distrusted, along with the strong belief that he should not be taking the place of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on the NSC, it’s likely that Bannon will be rejected by the Senate.

http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/trump-apparently-didnt-realize-steve-bannon-will-need-senate-confirmation-security-council/1282/
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is gonna be good C_U_L8R Jan 2017 #1
Well, he is feckless. DK504 Jan 2017 #24
I'd buy tickets jehop61 Jan 2017 #2
I'm not holding my breath PJMcK Jan 2017 #3
You speak for many of us world wide wally Jan 2017 #10
Agree. All those things we thought were going to explode in Trump's face have fizzled. Fla Dem Jan 2017 #20
Then Dem senators need to make it happen, but how? NT Ilsa Jan 2017 #4
Can't he just make him an executive secretary of the NSC then? Or 'staff"? jmg257 Jan 2017 #5
Yes. He wouldn't be a member, Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #8
He wasn't name a "member" -- he was named an invitee and does not require confirmation onenote Jan 2017 #21
I had thought I had heard the same thing, PRETZEL Jan 2017 #28
Trump doesn't care. Else You Are Mad Jan 2017 #6
Bannon first has to be a secretary or under secretary. Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #7
the Idiot doesn't care onetexan Jan 2017 #11
I know the idiot doesn't care. I'm just astounded at the challenge our side has Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #14
He was simply named an invitee, not a member. No confirmation necessary. onenote Jan 2017 #22
That is a new description. Ms. Toad Jan 2017 #23
Here is the official document onenote Jan 2017 #29
That makes sense, I think nt PRETZEL Jan 2017 #30
Trump's directive follows, in many respects, the wording of the Obama NSC directive onenote Jan 2017 #33
not an issue AlexSFCA Jan 2017 #9
After public hearings that will expose him to many who don't know his background. Good. nt pnwmom Jan 2017 #12
Who will enforce this?? SHRED Jan 2017 #13
The Germans have an appropriate saying for situations like this DFW Jan 2017 #16
Not true - like much in the Palmer Report. It's just clickbait. ehrnst Jan 2017 #15
Thanks for the link to a right-wing fake news site Blecht Jan 2017 #19
Here's the direct tweet to Laurence Tribe's tweet ehrnst Jan 2017 #25
twitchy is trash n/t librechik Jan 2017 #27
They have an abundant supply of rubber stamps in Congress world wide wally Jan 2017 #17
Unfortunately, Alter was wrong. onenote Jan 2017 #18
Do you have the text of the EO? rzemanfl Jan 2017 #34
Yes. And also the parallel one issued by Obama in 2009. onenote Jan 2017 #35
I read the stuff and agree. n/t rzemanfl Jan 2017 #36
Wouldn't he have to pass top secret clearance as well? Equinox Moon Jan 2017 #26
He doesn't oberliner Jan 2017 #31
Or more likely, Bannon didn't realize it. subterranean Jan 2017 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Traitor Trump didn't real...