Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Jimbo101

(776 posts)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 10:37 PM Jan 2017

CNN - Democrats consider backing off big battle over Trump's Supreme Court pick (WOW) [View all]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/30/politics/democrats-supreme-court-battle/index.html

Senate Democrats are weighing whether to avoid an all-out war to block President Donald Trump's upcoming Supreme Court pick, instead considering delaying that battle for a future nomination that could shift the ideological balance of the court, sources say.

The reason for the tactic: Republicans are considering gutting the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees if Democrats stay largely united and block Trump's first pick. By employing the so-called "nuclear option," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell could move to reduce the threshold for clearing a filibuster from 60 votes to 51 votes.

That would mean Democrats could lose leverage in the next Supreme Court fight if Trump were to replace a more liberal justice, since the GOP now has 52 seats in the Senate.

(You've Got to be kidding -
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh Boy! Wellstone ruled Jan 2017 #1
Sure. Why actually fight this fight when we can talk about fighting the next fight. n/t CincyDem Jan 2017 #2
Which we have been doing since Pelosi took impeachment off the table for Bush. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2017 #14
Great point. Hadn't put it into that larger perspective but you're right. n/t CincyDem Jan 2017 #18
She pissed me off so much then I have not been able to forget it. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2017 #19
And.... Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #3
But the next pick I feel we are really really really going to need it. TrekLuver Jan 2017 #11
Lucy...football...wash...rinse....repeat. n/t dixiegrrrrl Jan 2017 #20
Which Democrats are going to be the designated quislings this time? backscatter712 Jan 2017 #4
dafuq? elehhhhna Jan 2017 #5
Rachel did a great job tonight. nikibatts Jan 2017 #6
The only thing I can think of is perhaps Ginsburg's health is worse than we know Amishman Jan 2017 #7
She's in her 80s, and has had pancreatic cancer. Crunchy Frog Jan 2017 #13
FIGHT YOU BASTARDS!!! yuiyoshida Jan 2017 #8
I'm not surprised. frogmarch Jan 2017 #9
If McConnell wants his legacy to be... yallerdawg Jan 2017 #10
I heard earlier that they are only going to be able to really effectively fight for one nominee NoGoodNamesLeft Jan 2017 #12
Have they learned NOTHING? Why would they think Repubs are gonna do anything diferent the next time Amaryllis Jan 2017 #15
You mean they still want to keep their powder dry? The Dems must have the driest tblue37 Jan 2017 #16
I don't know wtf is happening with reports like this LittleBlue Jan 2017 #17
Primary any coward who votes to confirm n/t Fiendish Thingy Jan 2017 #21
I will not support ANY Democrat who votes to confirm this pig. geomon666 Jan 2017 #22
Forcing a nuclear showdown over this nomination would be strategically unwise. tritsofme Jan 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN - Democrats consider ...