Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tritsofme

(19,946 posts)
10. Your OP seems to exist in a bubble where Republicans could not invoke the nuclear option.
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 01:20 AM
Feb 2017

Their majority simply won't allow Senate Democrats to hold the seat open for two years, they would change the rules, end the filibuster, and confirm their nominee by majority vote.

As a consequence, Democrats would go into a potential Ginsberg vacancy completely irrelevant to conversation, because we wanted to make a symbolic but futile protest on the Scalia seat. We only get one bite at the Supreme Court filibuster apple, even if it proves futile, I'd rather spend it on a vacancy that alters the ideological composition of the Court.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats must filibuster...»Reply #10