Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)

10. Wait...

Reply to HiPointDem (Reply #9)

Wed Jun 27, 2012, 06:44 AM

Jun 2012

So you're saying that sunburn doesn't hurt very badly? Or that sunburn doesn't increase your risk of skin cancer? Or that the school didn't deny the kid access to sunscreen? If you aren't willing to say "yes" then you must admit the kid's life was endangered.

If I were the parent of that kid I would not only NOT back down against anyone who told me otherwise... I would sue and force my views upon that school. I would sue that school right into the ground and take the proceeds to get on television and send a warning to other schools NOT TO ENDANGER someone else's kid.

I'm thinking you probably understand how unyielding I am on this issue. And how correct I am, too.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Chapter 9 bankruptcy by the city of nearly 300,000 (Stockton, CA) [View all] SoCalDem Jun 2012 OP

sorry, everyone is too busy debating sunscreen policy at one school in tacoma to HiPointDem Jun 2012 #1

If it was your kid you'd be busy debating it, too. Zalatix Jun 2012 #4

it's not any of those people's kids. not only debating it, debating it for hundreds HiPointDem Jun 2012 #5

Because some kid's life was endangered by gross negligence. Zalatix Jun 2012 #8

the kids life wasn't endangered and it wasn't gross negligence and if you want to HiPointDem Jun 2012 #9

Wait... Zalatix Jun 2012 #10

go to the sunscreen thread do not pass go make that 'a' sunscreen thread, there are HiPointDem Jun 2012 #11

Hey, you brought up the issue on here. You made incorrect claims. I challenged them. Zalatix Jun 2012 #12

oreos oreos i love oreos filled with colored sunscreen HiPointDem Jun 2012 #13

Wow, when you can't win with logic, you have to fight back with.. that? Zalatix Jun 2012 #16

you're using logic? who knew? HiPointDem Jun 2012 #17

That's funny coming from a guy who said sunburn doesn't endanger a kid with albinism. Zalatix Jun 2012 #20

we spend trillions on our welfare military so people at home can live on the streets nt msongs Jun 2012 #2

+1. we spend billions to bailout banksters' bad real estate bets so houses can sit HiPointDem Jun 2012 #6

Frightening. Nt xchrom Jun 2012 #3

That's a $2333.33 cost per person @ 300k residents...more data in link SoCalDem Jun 2012 #7

$217 M Water Project begun in 2008 seems like a poor choice. FarCenter Jun 2012 #18

Evidently, the city of Stockton made poor lifestyle choices nxylas Jun 2012 #14

rampant tax cheats too. so i heard. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #15

This what happens when you think that property values will always go up hack89 Jun 2012 #19

This retiree is 56 with a $2k/mo pension and free health care? taught_me_patience Jun 2012 #21

I can't decide if that's sarcasm or not. Heywood J Jun 2012 #23

Banks got bailed out, we got sold out. nt. Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #22

We have a county in Oregon that is "near" having to do this. BlueIris Jun 2012 #24