Appeals Court upholds suspension of the immigrant ban. nt

[dixiegrrrrl]

2. Actually, what they upheld was that Trump's ban was not unreviewable....

When the appeal to Trump's immigration was filed, Twitler hauled out his Android and stated the courts could not intervene, that HIS decision was final.
Naturally, the courts were very interested, since Nixon had lost that argument almost 50 years ago.

“The Government does not merely argue that courts owe substantial deference to the immigration and national security policy determinations of the political branches — an uncontroversial principle that is well-grounded in our jurisprudence.
Instead, the Government has taken the position that the President’s decisions about immigration policy, particularly when motivated by national security concerns, are unreviewable, even if those actions potentially contravene constitutional rights and protections ...
There is no precedent to support this claimed unreviewability, which runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy.”

The court seemed particularly interested in what evidence Trump relied upon in implementing his order, and what limits the Justice Department saw on the president’s authority to set immigration policy.

http://tinyurl.com/zvsnghz

( Wash.Post article link)

this is gonna be the crux of his right to be the king he wants to be.
remember, in his world, NO one says no to him.