Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
3. I agree, but a large part of the problem is that the GOP has been
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 12:37 PM
Feb 2017

building the foundation for control since the 1960s.

First, the 1% bought most of the media outlets of any size, allowing them to control the editorial message as well as control what is covered as news.

Second, the 1% have been pushing tax cuts that have steadily shifted the tax burden from the rich to the workers.

Third, the 1% has been waging class warfare in the form of stagnant or falling wages, anti-union laws, and monopoly capitalism. When WalMart is the largest employer in the US, it is terrible news for US families.

Fourth, because of its market share, Texas basically decides for the nation what version of history is presented to children. So what is being taught supports the supply side version of history.

Progressives have a very uphill battle to fight, and as you wrote, it is essential that Democrats present a clear alternative to endless austerity.

What is NOT a surefire way to getting elected is running as almost as right wing as the GOP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Happy to recommend what I consider to be the best post so far this year. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #1
complaining that your base is actually holding you accountable AFTER an election yurbud Feb 2017 #2
I agree, but a large part of the problem is that the GOP has been guillaumeb Feb 2017 #3
and centrist Democrats have enabled a lot of that agenda yurbud Feb 2017 #4
Agreed, that some center-right Democrats agree with parts of the agenda. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #7
if we had a constitutional re-arrangement, I'd make Senate house of parties yurbud Feb 2017 #9
Excellent. concreteblue Feb 2017 #5
Excellent! HassleCat Feb 2017 #6
hasn't happened yet. yurbud Feb 2017 #8
More wholesale Democrat bashing? ismnotwasm Feb 2017 #10
Democrats don't have the House, Senate, or most statehouses... yurbud Feb 2017 #11
was there a particular point you disagreed with? yurbud Feb 2017 #12
Centrism was never the problem. JHan Feb 2017 #13
you are confusing two kinds of centrism: ideological pragmatism and politicians who are for sale yurbud Feb 2017 #14
Obama had a record and looking at who his political patrons were should have destroyed any yurbud Feb 2017 #15
And I'll use a phrase from him which should be lesson to us all... JHan Feb 2017 #16
There was an argument for the Third Way when Reaganism was ascendant and dominant but yurbud Feb 2017 #17
But that doesn't really have to do with Centrism though... JHan Feb 2017 #19
the FDIC had a process for dealing failing banks that involved firing the top yurbud Feb 2017 #21
clean energy lobbyist don't have enough money to buy politicians yet yurbud Feb 2017 #18
I raised that as an example because... JHan Feb 2017 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An answer to rebuild.demo...»Reply #3