Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,493 posts)
45. For what it's worth, I've been without conventional television
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:16 AM
Feb 2017

for more than 8 years. When I moved to my current city, I decided not to purchase a TV, because I couldn't really afford it, and even if I could, I didn't want to pay for cable. I honestly thought this would be temporary, and that I'd acquire conventional TV after a while. But then I learned that I could watch most important things on the internet, such as breaking news, or political conventions, stuff like that. And I could watch lots of television shows on the internet. Okay, so I'm not completely au courant about current shows, but most people probably aren't either. Meanwhile, I can watch tons of stuff, and it hardly matters if I'm a bit behind on a lot of shows.

As a bit of an aside, the very best thing about not having conventional TV is that I see very few commercials. This is especially gratifying during an election seasons (OMG, no political ads! It does not get much better than that!) but is also nice all of the rest of the time. I've gotten so spoiled by no commercials, that I've completely given up turning on the TV in a hotel room. I used to do that, turn on the TV in my hotel room, regularly. But I'd always get quite annoyed by the many commercials, and after no more than 45 minutes would turn it off. How do people put up with all those commercials? Not viewing them means I'm also not as surrounded by messages to Buy! Buy! Buy! that most people are. Which, quite frankly, makes it much easier to live on my limited income.

Oh, and for what it's worth, this is the fourth time in my life (I'm 68, in case that matters) that I've been without TV. This most recent time I honestly thought of it as an experiment, and totally assumed I'd go back to regular TV/cable soon enough. But the longer I went without, the happier I was. It's not as though I miss significant news stories. Any time there is some sort of breaking news, the local stations usually go to live streaming. I honestly don't miss anything that matters.

So my advice to anyone reading is, kill your TV. Cut the cord from cable. Trust me, you won't miss it. And you'll actually be better off because you won't be trapped into what conventional stations feed you.

Shall I mention that it was several years after the death of Michael Jackson that I learned that every single network had gone to live coverage, as if the death of a second rate entertainer was really worth wall to wall coverage?

Meanwhile, I read lots of books. I hang out at various places on the internet, including DU. And, at the risk of tooting my own horn, I really am better informed than almost anyone else I know.

So kill your TV. It will be the best thing you will ever do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's way past disgusting. Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #1
Publicity hound whose usual grab for attention is to show as much skin as possible. Guess that highplainsdem Feb 2017 #2
No kidding, this gal isn't publicity shy. braddy Feb 2017 #14
I'd wear that... madamesilverspurs Feb 2017 #3
Who is this ? obnoxiousdrunk Feb 2017 #4
I was wondering the same thing. That dress is an abomination. dewsgirl Feb 2017 #8
I've never heard of this woman. Dulcinea Feb 2017 #57
The back of the dress. HipChick Feb 2017 #5
A dress that reads RUMP from behind! How tasteful! struggle4progress Feb 2017 #19
Looks horrible in every way. Kath2 Feb 2017 #37
She probably got paid to wear it ... FrenchieCat Feb 2017 #46
The CBS affiliate here reported it's by a Filipino designer pinboy3niner Feb 2017 #47
I'm confused Phoenix61 Feb 2017 #6
Are we all supposed to know who that is? longship Feb 2017 #7
Yeah. I realize that I don't recognize PoindexterOglethorpe Feb 2017 #42
That's my thinking as well. longship Feb 2017 #43
For what it's worth, I've been without conventional television PoindexterOglethorpe Feb 2017 #45
Publicity...she is not a household name by merit she'll do it this way then. TrekLuver Feb 2017 #9
To be fair, Many folks are not household names by merit. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #48
I don't know who this is, but her dress is pretty tacky and logosoco Feb 2017 #10
I've gathered this is Joy Villa? TSIAS Feb 2017 #11
she wore an orange mesh traffic/cone/blocking off material dress salin Feb 2017 #53
it looks like it's made out of a flag or something similar....parachute fabric or something. KewlKat Feb 2017 #12
that's what it looks like to me. like she got a some banners or flags and put it together. it looks JI7 Feb 2017 #26
Click on the link below to see what that idiot wore to the Grammys last year: highplainsdem Feb 2017 #13
Clicked on those links, and all I can say... 3catwoman3 Feb 2017 #30
Am I supposed to know who this is? ismnotwasm Feb 2017 #15
Someone is actually watching that crappy award show? Ligyron Feb 2017 #16
Yes I am. democratisphere Feb 2017 #18
Wikipedia article on her. Looks like it's all self-promotion. highplainsdem Feb 2017 #17
The only way to have been "once Grammy considered" is if... GReedDiamond Feb 2017 #38
That dress is as tacky as it gets! democratisphere Feb 2017 #20
Is she stupid? Can she not see what trump is doing to America and Cha Feb 2017 #21
Was it a choice of the dress or getting 'TRUMP' tattooed on her forehead? nt procon Feb 2017 #22
its working for her. look at the attention she's getting on DU :-) nt msongs Feb 2017 #23
lol may she get all the cheap headlines and tweets she yearned for .. lol JHan Feb 2017 #24
Talentless skank wants attention samir.g Feb 2017 #25
Maybe she'll get a job offer meadowlark5 Feb 2017 #27
My money's on Ambassador to Tackystan pinboy3niner Feb 2017 #28
I was thinking ambassador meadowlark5 Feb 2017 #34
There you go making me laugh again pinboy3niner! montana_hazeleyes Feb 2017 #50
The Trumpsters have already adopted her as their mascot qanda Feb 2017 #29
Disgusting. What a skank and traitor to her race agenasolva Feb 2017 #31
Post removed Post removed Feb 2017 #35
I checked her out on YouTube jmowreader Feb 2017 #32
What an asshole! Kath2 Feb 2017 #33
Good Christ, that's ugly. Warren DeMontague Feb 2017 #36
who is this soon to be has been? MFM008 Feb 2017 #39
Who needs a barf bag? I have some. Initech Feb 2017 #40
Never heard of her... Deuce Feb 2017 #41
Attention Hound... LovingA2andMI Feb 2017 #44
Eh... I'm not that incensed. SaschaHM Feb 2017 #49
They posed her to make it look like the Grammy gramophone lapucelle Feb 2017 #51
Not familiar with her at all. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #52
Looks like a grammy worm Mendocino Feb 2017 #54
Good luck with that sweetheart. nt Kahuna7 Feb 2017 #55
Do I smell money passing hands? Vinca Feb 2017 #56
Amazon Digital music has her at #1 now highmindedhavi Feb 2017 #58
I heard she was a Scientologist Union Label Feb 2017 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OMGosh......she's wearing...»Reply #45