Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

procon

(15,805 posts)
32. Why do you think our defense capabilities are so inadequate?
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:05 AM
Feb 2017

I hear this scary theme from other rightwing apparatchiks, but c'mon, we have the biggest military in the world and you're equating our state of the art arsenal and missile defense force with some backwards third world country using a refurbished missile launcher bolted onto an old pickup truck.

Remember your history? Back in the Bush Administration we likewise had a White House that was dangerously indifferent to facts. Using the same premise you've submitted, that the US should use nukes first before No. Korea can obliterate California, the diabolical Dick Cheney came up with the 'The One Percent Doctrine'. This fallacy concocted the notion that the US could order a preemptive strike without the need for evidence because Cheney said that even if there was only a one percent chance of something happening, then we would treat it was a eminent threat and act accordingly. Bush accepted that view and went on to substitute mere suspicion for evidence in Iraq.

Let's not reconstitute Dick Cheney's 'The One Percent Doctrine'.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think Japan has far more to worry about. As for JenniferJuniper Feb 2017 #1
I think I agree...Never. Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #2
Not to mention, NK has enough conventional weaponry pointed at Seoul bhikkhu Feb 2017 #14
That is why we should be working with China so it doesn't come to that still_one Feb 2017 #3
Obvious answer: D - Never. mwooldri Feb 2017 #4
Exactly. Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #5
They're always salivating over California getting nuked. Iggo Feb 2017 #33
I think Trump will use the next nuke, where who knows? doc03 Feb 2017 #28
Avoiding a first strike policy doesn't mean we need a first struck policy tirebiter Feb 2017 #6
Only after greytdemocrat Feb 2017 #7
I agree...if any part of the US IS NUKED... Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #8
Wouldn't that also apply to our allies? Whichever ones will be left lol. TrekLuver Feb 2017 #9
Good question..I don't know. Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #12
If they are our allies we must defend them. The NATO thing was only excercized once... TrekLuver Feb 2017 #13
Yes. Right after you can explain what will happen next. rug Feb 2017 #10
Do we really need more panic right now? BainsBane Feb 2017 #11
We should deal with reality. Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author BainsBane Feb 2017 #16
I agree. And the reality is they're doing the same shit they always do. Iggo Feb 2017 #34
Never libtodeath Feb 2017 #17
Never ? Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #18
I dont believe in using nukes under any circumstances. libtodeath Feb 2017 #21
C. former9thward Feb 2017 #19
There are some people here who would... Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #20
Might does seem to make right, and allows us to justify aggression LanternWaste Feb 2017 #23
They run on computers Generic Other Feb 2017 #22
Take them out in what way? MineralMan Feb 2017 #24
If it looks like an attack (on anybody) is imminent Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2017 #25
North Korean artillery with rocket assisted projectiles would devastate Seoul in response. stevenleser Feb 2017 #26
Never. democratisphere Feb 2017 #27
North Korea isn't a threat, they're always doing missile things. betsuni Feb 2017 #29
If North Korea ever loaded an operative nuclear weapon on an ICBM .... Botany Feb 2017 #30
How? Short of using nukes how do you do it? nt doc03 Feb 2017 #31
Why do you think our defense capabilities are so inadequate? procon Feb 2017 #32
kick for am posters and opinions Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ok...is there any point w...»Reply #32