General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is the mandate a violation of the First Amendment? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)going to something like HC, can take food off the tables of some Americans. I do not know anyone without insurance who is without it because they do not want it. They have priorities, kids, food to feed them, clothes, which many buy in thrift shops, and even though they are working, they are barely surviving.
So as Obama said, and he was aware that many people were too poor to pay for HC, 'it would be so unfair to force people who are poor to pay for something they cannot afford'. He was right then.
That is why he used the 'forcing the homeless to buy a house' solving the homeless problem analogy. Because he got it. McCain did not get it, nor did Hillary.
And those who will be considered among those who can afford it, will get the shittiest policies because all they be able to do is pay the very minimum, to try to avoid the tax, which is coercion btw. They will have huge co-pays, and most likely will never be able to use what they are being forced to pay for.