Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,903 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 07:18 PM Jun 2012

... House Progressives Will Seek Single-Payer Plan If Mandate Goes Down. [View all]

WASHINGTON -- The last thing House progressives want is for the Supreme Court to strike down President Barack Obama's health care law. But if the high court rules Thursday that some or all of the law is unconstitutional, progressives are ready to renew their push for the model of health care they wanted all along: the single-payer option.

"It's easy to see it's a good idea," Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told The Huffington Post. "It's the cheapest way to cover everybody."

Ellison said all 75 members of the caucus have already signed onto a bill by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) to create a single-payer, publicly financed, privately delivered universal health care program. The proposal would essentially build on and expand Medicare, under which all Americans would be guaranteed access to health care regardless of an ability to pay or pre-existing health conditions.

House progressives pushed hard for a single-payer option, such as the "Medicare for all" approach, during the health care reform debate in 2009. But House Democratic leaders couldn't come up with the votes to pass the proposal, and progressives ultimately caved on the idea in order to pass the president's plan, on the reasoning that some reform was better than none at all.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/27/house-progressives-single-payer-health-care_n_1630777.html

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conyers and Ellison!!! Again! longship Jun 2012 #1
And sadly, Max Baucus will be right there in the Senate BumRushDaShow Jun 2012 #2
Given that Bernie Sanders says that there were only 10 or so Senators who would vote for it, karynnj Jun 2012 #24
And there's no reason not to try Scootaloo Jun 2012 #26
As if it could pass even with Baucus. You need 60 votes. So please, enough of that. RBInMaine Jun 2012 #31
The Republicans don't need 60 votes for their bills. So please, enough of that. Leopolds Ghost Jun 2012 #34
Du rec. Nt xchrom Jun 2012 #3
I'd prefer if they said they would seek single payer regardless of the SC's decision. nt chowder66 Jun 2012 #4
^^ This! LeftofObama Jun 2012 #5
tanks! chowder66 Jun 2012 #10
It's about "gnikcuf" time! KansDem Jun 2012 #6
Yes indeed! Plucketeer Jun 2012 #20
k&r a thousand times!!!!! robinlynne Jun 2012 #7
Exercise in futility. DCBob Jun 2012 #8
Ah the Pessimism packaged as Pragmatism wail! Bluenorthwest Jun 2012 #36
Spare me the lecture. I'm simply suggesting we focus our effort on something thats doable. DCBob Jun 2012 #40
And every other elected (bought) Democrat will ignore them. MrSlayer Jun 2012 #9
Exactly - one corporate party, two faces. polichick Jun 2012 #17
Um, the REPUBLICANS control the House. Maybe, uh, try bashing them instead. (???) RBInMaine Jun 2012 #30
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #11
I suspected this might happen, because I believed the ACA to be a sort of planned failure. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #12
Can you really see it passing either House? karynnj Jun 2012 #25
Take a look at some polling. A good majority supports Medicare for All Bluenorthwest Jun 2012 #37
I've looked at polling, but the relevant group to poll here consists of the members of Congress karynnj Jun 2012 #42
Why seek single payer if Mandate goes down? What a clunky bunch! midnight Jun 2012 #13
If you wish him support, then support him. Calling him clunky is not support. It is unfounded Bluenorthwest Jun 2012 #38
Hurray! mckara Jun 2012 #14
Dennis Kucinich was right! TransitJohn Jun 2012 #15
All the more evidence that the mandate will stand, IMO demwing Jun 2012 #16
I doubt that will pass sakabatou Jun 2012 #18
And if it is upheld, they should push for single-payer anyway, state by state under the opt out. SunSeeker Jun 2012 #19
There isnt enough of them. It will never happen. scheming daemons Jun 2012 #21
Are these the same House Progressive who said they wouldn't vote for a bill that didn't include a Puregonzo1188 Jun 2012 #22
K&R MustBeTheBooz Jun 2012 #23
Would Like Single Payer, But This Court Would Knock It Down Too TomCADem Jun 2012 #27
Only Way This Has Legs... KharmaTrain Jun 2012 #28
And it will be an act of futility because a snowball in hell has a better chance of PASSING. However RBInMaine Jun 2012 #29
I'd rather lose doing it right, than win doing it wrong louis c Jun 2012 #32
Lame posturing. Laelth Jun 2012 #33
Agreed, sadly. n/t Leopolds Ghost Jun 2012 #35
Where was their balls when they needed them? Hubert Flottz Jun 2012 #39
Wait...WHO? will be seeking Single-Payer? Not House *leadership*... nt Romulox Jun 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»... House Progressives Wi...