Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

14. What we are mainly dealing with here is structural.

Reply to hughee99 (Reply #8)

Thu Feb 16, 2017, 08:08 PM

Feb 2017

Systems and direction. I don't think the two are as far apart as some make them out to be.

There are many examples throughout the NFL's history where teams didn't have the starting qb named the day before a game and won. It's an expression that only looks good at face value.

You might also be perfectly accurate.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How would you feel if the DNC made a bold move and went with a co-chair? [View all] NCTraveler Feb 2017 OP

IMO - If they could work together it might be a great solution Lucinda Feb 2017 #1

My immediate concern... NCTraveler Feb 2017 #6

+1 uponit7771 Feb 2017 #16

give it a try gopiscrap Feb 2017 #2

Is that idea even being offered or floated? still_one Feb 2017 #3

I read an article about it last year. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #7

Thanks, just wondering still_one Feb 2017 #10

Yes, let's stop fighting each other fallrey Feb 2017 #4

Just stop already. demmiblue Feb 2017 #13

I'd like that, especially if one of them was Howard Dean MrPurple Feb 2017 #5

Like the old staying goes "If you have two starting quarterbacks, you have none". hughee99 Feb 2017 #8

What we are mainly dealing with here is structural. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #14

Yes, but when game time rolls around, you only have one QB on the field at a time. hughee99 Feb 2017 #23

Ultimately those two agendas have to succeed together anyway so why not start now? TeamPooka Feb 2017 #22

I have no problem with that (though it is not going to happen). demmiblue Feb 2017 #9

No, it's really hard to have "equals" in a leadership position. One voice is needed. SharonAnn Feb 2017 #11

No. The organization needs a leader. The operative word there is "a". As in one. Stinky The Clown Feb 2017 #12

Why? Besides ... Ellison is toast already. Susan Sarandon adores him and ... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #15

oh... didn't know Sarandon liked him... shit uponit7771 Feb 2017 #18

I fully understand your position. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #20

To add, the person who inferred we are anti-Muslim can go fuck himself. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #21

I'm OK with it. n/t GP6971 Feb 2017 #17

2 brains are better than one. TrekLuver Feb 2017 #19

Both are good men and I could live with both. hrmjustin Feb 2017 #24