Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(320 posts)

4. Correct. That's why an independent prosecutor needs appointed.

Thu Feb 16, 2017, 11:22 PM

Feb 2017

But, the rethugs in the house are more worried about the 2018 elections than national security.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

give it time.... chillfactor Feb 2017 #1

I think there is more to the story BainsBane Feb 2017 #2

The FBI does not decide who gets charged and who doesn't Jersey Devil Feb 2017 #3

Correct. That's why an independent prosecutor needs appointed. strongermessage Feb 2017 #4

This thread is getting attention on Twitter TubbersUK Feb 2017 #5

Ah, I see now TubbersUK Feb 2017 #8

"over the call" bigtree Feb 2017 #7

What's interesting is they have been doing these investigations for jmg257 Feb 2017 #9

Proof of lie might not be admissible in court Trekologer Feb 2017 #11

Martha Stewart should have conspired with Russians SoCalDem Feb 2017 #12

If that was just a peon, they would be thrown in Leavenworth. Rex Feb 2017 #15