Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
23. Yes, but when game time rolls around, you only have one QB on the field at a time.
Thu Feb 16, 2017, 10:36 PM
Feb 2017

With a finite amount of resources available, my concern is that with two people calling the shots, they will be allocated to keep competing internal interests happy, not what is best for the party. There's already high level executives, committees and boards, but in the end, I think there needs to be a singular final authority to make a call or break a stalemate if necessary. Perhaps if they clearly divided duties rather than shared them, it would work better, but in the end, even that could present a problem when it comes to resource allocation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IMO - If they could work together it might be a great solution Lucinda Feb 2017 #1
My immediate concern... NCTraveler Feb 2017 #6
+1 uponit7771 Feb 2017 #16
give it a try gopiscrap Feb 2017 #2
Is that idea even being offered or floated? still_one Feb 2017 #3
I read an article about it last year. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #7
Thanks, just wondering still_one Feb 2017 #10
Yes, let's stop fighting each other fallrey Feb 2017 #4
Just stop already. demmiblue Feb 2017 #13
I'd like that, especially if one of them was Howard Dean MrPurple Feb 2017 #5
Like the old staying goes "If you have two starting quarterbacks, you have none". hughee99 Feb 2017 #8
What we are mainly dealing with here is structural. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #14
Yes, but when game time rolls around, you only have one QB on the field at a time. hughee99 Feb 2017 #23
Ultimately those two agendas have to succeed together anyway so why not start now? TeamPooka Feb 2017 #22
I have no problem with that (though it is not going to happen). demmiblue Feb 2017 #9
No, it's really hard to have "equals" in a leadership position. One voice is needed. SharonAnn Feb 2017 #11
No. The organization needs a leader. The operative word there is "a". As in one. Stinky The Clown Feb 2017 #12
Why? Besides ... Ellison is toast already. Susan Sarandon adores him and ... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #15
oh... didn't know Sarandon liked him... shit uponit7771 Feb 2017 #18
I fully understand your position. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #20
To add, the person who inferred we are anti-Muslim can go fuck himself. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #21
I'm OK with it. n/t GP6971 Feb 2017 #17
2 brains are better than one. TrekLuver Feb 2017 #19
Both are good men and I could live with both. hrmjustin Feb 2017 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How would you feel if the...»Reply #23