Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
25. Ah - so not federalizing NG units, but working with states through the AG...
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 03:02 PM
Feb 2017
Pursuant to Title 32 of the United States Code, State National Guard components are
employees of their respective states and are under the command of their Governors when they are
not in federal service. Based on their training and experience, these men and women are
particularly well-suited to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law and augment
border security operations by Department components.

To maximize participation by state and local jurisdictions in the enforcement of federal
immigration law, I am directing the Director of ICE to engage with all willing and qualified law
enforcement jurisdictions for the purpose of entering into agreements under section 287(g) of the
INA. Additionally, I am directing the Commissioner of CBP and the Director of ICE to
immediately engage with the Governors of the States adjacent to the land border with Mexico and
those States adjoining such border States for the purpose of entering into agreements under
section 287(g) of the INA to authorize qualified members of the State National Guard, while such
members are not in federal service, or qualified members of a state militia or state defense force
under the command of the Governor, to perform the functions of an immigration officer in
relation to the investigation, apprehension, and detention of aliens in the United States.


INA 287(g)

(g) (1) 1/ Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, United States Code, the Attorney General may enter into a written agreement with a State, or any political subdivision of a State, pursuant to which an officer or employee of the State or subdivision, who is determined by the Attorney General to be qualified to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension or detention of aliens in the United States (including the transportation of such aliens across State line s to detention centers), may carry out such function at the expense of the State or political subdivision and to extent consistent with State and local law.

(2) An agreement under this subsection shall require that an officer or employee of a State or political subdivision of a State performing a function under the agreement shall have knowledge of, and adhere to, Federal law relating to the function, and shall contain a written certification that the officers or employees performing the function under the agreement have received adequate training regarding the enforcement of relevant Federal immigration laws.

(3) In performing a function under this subsection, an officer or employee of a State or political subdivision of a State shall be subject to the direction and supervision of the Attorney General.

(4) In performing a function under this subsection, an officer or employee of a State or political subdivision of a State may use Federal property or facilities, as provided in a written agreement between the Attorney General and the State or subdivision.

(5) With respect to each officer or employee of a State or political subdivision who is authorized to perform a function under this subsection, the specific powers and duties that may be, or are required to be, exercised or performed by the individual, the duration of the authority of the individual, and the position of the agency of the Attorney General who is required to supervise and direct the individual, shall be set forth in a written agreement between the Attorney General and the State or po litical subdivision.
...
(8) An officer or employee of a State or political subdivision of a State acting under color of authority under this subsection, or any agreement entered into under this subsection, shall be considered to be acting under color of Federal authority for purposes of determining the liability, and immunity from suit, of the officer or employee in a civil action brought under Federal or State law.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Download this thing before it disappears! 2naSalit Feb 2017 #1
Done Angry Dragon Feb 2017 #51
Everyone receiving it is listed as Acting exboyfil Feb 2017 #2
Nothing to see here citizen...move on workinclasszero Feb 2017 #3
and now republicans are lying about this, saying it's unreal Achilleaze Feb 2017 #4
this is a test MyMission Feb 2017 #5
welcome to du, and thanks for being part of the fight!! niyad Feb 2017 #38
They may just be throwing out chum. Who knows? If this is NOT from DHS/Kelly KittyWampus Feb 2017 #6
I have to agree with what your saying. N/t Victor_c3 Feb 2017 #45
» bigtree Feb 2017 #7
Marking so I can find later... TheDebbieDee Feb 2017 #8
Lying liars. SHRED Feb 2017 #9
Attached is the relevant section.... mikelewis Feb 2017 #10
I don't believe this is real. they are stirring up shit. Dream Girl Feb 2017 #11
It is real as a heart attack orangecrush Feb 2017 #12
I know this was reported in AP, but think the document itself was planted and is a fake Dream Girl Feb 2017 #14
When Trump said that the leaks were real but the news fake he left a clue karadax Feb 2017 #21
Yep. I just have a feeling this isn't real. My spidery sense tells me something's up. Dream Girl Feb 2017 #42
I thought the section on unaccompanied minors was more disheartening metalbot Feb 2017 #13
OK, if I'm reading this correctly, it doesn't propose MineralMan Feb 2017 #15
What state would sanction this action? workinclasszero Feb 2017 #18
What state? AZ, TX, NM, FL... MineralMan Feb 2017 #20
Sure, wait till those crops are rotting in the fields workinclasszero Feb 2017 #23
You'd think so, wouldn't you? MineralMan Feb 2017 #24
One thing I know in this world... workinclasszero Feb 2017 #33
Republican Senators must be shitting bricks. Volaris Feb 2017 #16
Look over there! A shiny thing...! Fritz Walter Feb 2017 #17
Yep...getting every one all twisted in knots. Dream Girl Feb 2017 #44
Shouty Spice says it is "100% untrue". MontanaMama Feb 2017 #19
The National Guard is a military unit . . . OldRedneck Feb 2017 #22
Haven't you heard of John Warner? George W. Bush? jmg257 Feb 2017 #26
But, see, there's the awkward fact that National Guard units are MineralMan Feb 2017 #27
"Posse Comitatus" doesn't apply to any National Guard troops acting under control of the governor PoliticAverse Feb 2017 #29
Ah - so not federalizing NG units, but working with states through the AG... jmg257 Feb 2017 #25
Yes. That law appears to be the "out" in this. MineralMan Feb 2017 #28
Yes - that is the way I read it. But I also think federalizing the units might also be doable jmg257 Feb 2017 #31
I'm not finding a Warner Act that impacts immigration. MineralMan Feb 2017 #32
No worries - see my other post - links & text in there. nt jmg257 Feb 2017 #34
Gotcha. MineralMan Feb 2017 #35
The issue w/the Govs will be 'So, are you friggin' PAYING, Uncle Sam?' mr_lebowski Feb 2017 #41
Yes, perhaps. I don't know. We'll have to wait and see what transpires. MineralMan Feb 2017 #43
Border states could go along, usually red already. jmg257 Feb 2017 #47
That's what I'm thinking, too. MineralMan Feb 2017 #48
Agree - other thread calling it bogus. jmg257 Feb 2017 #49
Republicans have lost all credibility and moral authority for a generation SpankMe Feb 2017 #30
It doesn't sound like WH is denying authenticity. earthside Feb 2017 #36
White House has already DENIED this. Either bogus or a dye test for leakers by bogus document. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #37
This is scary agenasolva Feb 2017 #39
Good old tried and true MFM008 Feb 2017 #40
With this admin, denies very aptly sounds a lot like Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2017 #46
I thought the press conference yesterday was scary. Brogrizzly Feb 2017 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Full, 11-page draft DHS m...»Reply #25