Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There are no Sanders movement - GE voting numbers - millenials turnout rate is down and more diverse [View all]SharonAnn
(14,173 posts)69. "Democrats fall in love but Republicans fall in line"
Famous quote about primaries and the two parties. Democrats fall in love and if their chosen one doesn't win, they often disengage. Republicans will vote for the winner of their primary, whether not is was their chosen candidate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are no Sanders movement - GE voting numbers - millenials turnout rate is down and more diverse [View all]
factfinder_77
Feb 2017
OP
You could not reason. it was useless. They had drunk themselves into a tizzy
boston bean
Feb 2017
#5
Even the current reality of having Trump in office won't awaken them. They're still in denial ...
NurseJackie
Feb 2017
#14
There was one poster since no banned, who always claimed to be bullied, yet was the biggest bully of
boston bean
Feb 2017
#15
That is true. But how to reach those? They believed the hype and decided they couldn't vote for
boston bean
Feb 2017
#8
I really do think the Comey thing gave many people an excuse to vote trump.
boston bean
Feb 2017
#12
That is not part of this discussion. this is a thread about the GE. Not Bernie/Hillary.
boston bean
Feb 2017
#13
It certainly doesn't have anything to do with GE, because he wasn't on the ballot.
boston bean
Feb 2017
#22
and??? If he were.. which he wasn't, but he should have been, but he wasn't
boston bean
Feb 2017
#26
the question is, what was the point of the headline? What are those numbers supposed to say? nt
JCanete
Feb 2017
#23
what? Where is his name mentioned other than the title? It's not in the article either, unless I
JCanete
Feb 2017
#30
and? Is the point to talk in some code that only certain people understand? Say I'm slow, or dumb,
JCanete
Feb 2017
#32
I don't particularly enjoy having words with you. And it aint because I can't handle it.
boston bean
Feb 2017
#33
fair enough...you just couched it as if it was something. At least we both know it was worthless.
JCanete
Feb 2017
#41
oh really? What exactly are you fighting against here? Was my question legitimate or not, and if not
JCanete
Feb 2017
#46
I disagree with you on that. No doubt super progressive candidates have an uphill battle.
JCanete
Feb 2017
#65
HRC got a higher share of youth vote than any Dem candidate since the 26th amendment, except Obama
fishwax
Feb 2017
#34
Is there a way to block terms so I can make all mention of Bernie disappear?
NoGoodNamesLeft
Feb 2017
#38
all i know is that in my local dem party, those who show up majority were for bernie
dembotoz
Feb 2017
#62