Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eniwetok

(1,629 posts)
4. Choice is often inefficient...
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 07:47 PM
Feb 2017

I find it amusing that the right seems hung up on choice... as if more choices isn't more costly.
It costs more to administer all those ala cart plans, with all their separate coverage and billing procedures... and what good is choice if many of the choices are bad ones... for inferior policies. Canada and other Single Payer nations prove that covering everything and having simplified billing procedures is cheaper in the long run.

But it does raise the question why, if our system is so grotesquely inefficient, why is the GOP intent on preserving it? Why are the only options they propose all ridiclous such as HSAs and selling insurance across state lines?

I suspect this goes back to 1993. The 80% of GOP senators signed on to plans with an individual mandate. Then by 94 they changed to their current positions. I suspect a 1993 policy memo that a national health plan would ruin the GOP "brand" and posed an existential threat to the GOP. Of course they COULD just have signed on...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fraud, greed and overpricing run rampant in our health care system Calculating Feb 2017 #1
That latest and greatest equipment saves lives. ileus Feb 2017 #5
How much more research could we afford.... once we get rid of innefficiency? eniwetok Feb 2017 #6
I think we also need to look at patent law... eniwetok Feb 2017 #7
advertising crazycatlady Feb 2017 #9
I think the marketing and advertising industry is killing us. Initech Feb 2017 #11
This Wounded Bear Feb 2017 #20
There was an article in the NYT about how US companies were developing propriatary hips and tools... eniwetok Feb 2017 #24
Yes, I agree with you there. Kimchijeon Feb 2017 #12
Because god forbid somebody get something that someone else doesn't think they deserve. RedWedge Feb 2017 #2
Thanks for the numbers Ezior Feb 2017 #3
Choice is often inefficient... eniwetok Feb 2017 #4
We are talking about people here and there lies the problem. NOBODY wants to pay for something they Jim Beard Feb 2017 #8
Mexico's per capita spending $956.2 eniwetok Feb 2017 #13
Profit, profit, profit, profit, and profit. Initech Feb 2017 #10
profit alone would not be an issue.... eniwetok Feb 2017 #17
profits of insurance/big-pharma companies DrDan Feb 2017 #14
When making the argument it is also important to mention the life expectancy of these nations Victor_c3 Feb 2017 #15
sure... and if we compare US vs Canada eniwetok Feb 2017 #16
speaking of life expectancy... check out this spreadsheet! eniwetok Feb 2017 #18
This meme probably explains a lot too Victor_c3 Feb 2017 #19
whew! I knew Carson was a crackpot... so it was wacky but not unbelievable. nt eniwetok Feb 2017 #23
This hardly something nobody knew about... Wounded Bear Feb 2017 #21
numbers are one thing... how to USE them is another. eniwetok Feb 2017 #22
We're not stupid: We're greedy. We refuse to make healthcare non-profit. lindysalsagal Feb 2017 #25
What part of "for profit" do you not understand? mountain grammy Feb 2017 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health Care Spending: Why...»Reply #4