Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

eniwetok

(1,629 posts)

6. How much more research could we afford.... once we get rid of innefficiency?

Reply to ileus (Reply #5)

Mon Feb 20, 2017, 08:42 PM

Feb 2017

And I don't mind targeted capital gains breaks for investments in critical areas of research. I just oppose it for reckless speculation.

And I'd LOVE to see NIH fund and coordinate all pharmaceutical research. Big Pharma pisses away more on overhead including promotion than it does on R&D. Then NIH could farm out contracts to make the drugs cheaper.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Health Care Spending: Why Is America Soooooooo Stupid? [View all] eniwetok Feb 2017 OP

Fraud, greed and overpricing run rampant in our health care system Calculating Feb 2017 #1

That latest and greatest equipment saves lives. ileus Feb 2017 #5

How much more research could we afford.... once we get rid of innefficiency? eniwetok Feb 2017 #6

I think we also need to look at patent law... eniwetok Feb 2017 #7

advertising crazycatlady Feb 2017 #9

I think the marketing and advertising industry is killing us. Initech Feb 2017 #11

This Wounded Bear Feb 2017 #20

There was an article in the NYT about how US companies were developing propriatary hips and tools... eniwetok Feb 2017 #24

Yes, I agree with you there. Kimchijeon Feb 2017 #12

Because god forbid somebody get something that someone else doesn't think they deserve. RedWedge Feb 2017 #2

Thanks for the numbers Ezior Feb 2017 #3

Choice is often inefficient... eniwetok Feb 2017 #4

We are talking about people here and there lies the problem. NOBODY wants to pay for something they Jim Beard Feb 2017 #8

Mexico's per capita spending $956.2 eniwetok Feb 2017 #13

Profit, profit, profit, profit, and profit. Initech Feb 2017 #10

profit alone would not be an issue.... eniwetok Feb 2017 #17

profits of insurance/big-pharma companies DrDan Feb 2017 #14

When making the argument it is also important to mention the life expectancy of these nations Victor_c3 Feb 2017 #15

sure... and if we compare US vs Canada eniwetok Feb 2017 #16

speaking of life expectancy... check out this spreadsheet! eniwetok Feb 2017 #18

This meme probably explains a lot too Victor_c3 Feb 2017 #19

whew! I knew Carson was a crackpot... so it was wacky but not unbelievable. nt eniwetok Feb 2017 #23

This hardly something nobody knew about... Wounded Bear Feb 2017 #21

numbers are one thing... how to USE them is another. eniwetok Feb 2017 #22

We're not stupid: We're greedy. We refuse to make healthcare non-profit. lindysalsagal Feb 2017 #25

What part of "for profit" do you not understand? mountain grammy Feb 2017 #26