General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ironically, once you decide a person or group is "stupid," you are relieved from thinking about them [View all]RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)"My opinion of engaging those ideologies is by calling them out as racists, bigots, sexists, etc.
As I see it, those terms all have reasonably objective definitions that can be applied. For instance, I can explain how most abortion laws are actually morality laws against women's sexuality. A Trump voter may not agree - they may not even understand - but it is a rational process. I can do the same with racist behavior, environmental degradation, crimes against queer, trans, and other disempowered groups - but I cannot explain why someone is stupid. For me, the word has no objective, baseline meaning. I think it is really serving as a label of "less-human-than-I-am" and gives the user permission to disregard the humanity of their ideological rivals.
Again, I think calling out bigotry, racism, hate crimes, anti-semitism, etc, is absolutely critical to the struggle because they are demonstrable definitionally. However, "stupid" "deplorable" "degenerate" and so on are subjective words that I do not think have very wide spread definitions in common."
I am not at all advocating what you are describing. I am not talking about people's feelings being hurt. I am not talking about leaving racism, sexism, and violence against the less powerful unchallenged and unlabelled. I am stating that terms like "stupid" and so on are not widely definable and serve only to galvanize and dehumanize one's ideological rivals.