Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FSogol

(47,608 posts)
18. Martin O'Malley endorsed Pete Buttigieg also. Here's what he said:
Wed Feb 22, 2017, 10:46 AM
Feb 2017
'If you’ve been reading the coverage of the DNC Chair race, it would be easy to think that it’s all about the past — who dines with the most big shots at Washington salon dinners, who chose the “right” faction in our Party’s 2016 loss. None of that has anything to do with rebuilding our Party now.

The DNC Chair race is not about the past. It’s not about Washington insiders or the moneyed status quo. It’s about our future.
That’s why I’m supporting Mayor Pete Buttigieg — because our Party needs new leadership and a fresh start

The only good news emerging from Trump’s electoral college victory is that more and more good people today want to run for office than ever before. Many of these patriotic women and men are millennials. They are not only the largest voting bloc by age, but also more diverse by race and more inclusive by nature than their parents and grandparents. They are the core of the resistance to Trumpism. They were on the front lines with me and my own family at the Women’s March in Washington and other cities. It is important to note that Pete was the only DNC Chair candidate to attend the Women’s March.

The Democratic Party of the past became very good at telling millennials to wait their turn. But the future cannot wait. We must call forward the goodness in the hearts of young Americans if we are going to save our country and overcome the darkness of Trumpism. And that is one very important reason we should pick a millennial like Pete to run the DNC.

Our Party has — for too long — ignored critical state and local elections. While we pretended that Party no longer matters, Republicans racked up unprecedented victories in statehouses and governors’ mansions all across the country. We Democrats abandoned our “50-State Plan,” and we have paid the price for not acting like a national party. We can’t afford to become a coastal party. We can’t pretend that state and local races don’t matter — they do. We must compete in even the reddest of districts.

Mayors are on the front lines, they get things done. They see the whole picture, not just pieces of it. If we’re serious about an inclusive 50 State strategy, we should pick a two-term Mayor from a red state like Pete to run the DNC.

Finally, our Party is the Party of values — American values. Mayor Pete’s service to others has always been rooted in the values that unite us — freedom, fairness, families, and the future. He understands our economy is not money, it is people — all of our people. That we must always connect our values and our political choices to the lived experiences of real people.

If we learned one thing from 2016, it’s that people have lost their faith in the future and their faith that their children’s lives will be better than their own. We need to reinvigorate people’s belief that the Democratic Party can improve their lives. And we need a leader who will speak with clarity to the hopes and aspirations of every family in cities and small towns all across our country.

I know many of the other candidates for DNC Chair in this race. While they are all good people, this election is about who can best lead the Democratic Party forward in these times. Mayor Pete has the vision and experience that we need — especially right now. That is why I’m urging you to Pick Pete for DNC Chair.'

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm old and cranky... Zoonart Feb 2017 #1
not just advisers NewJeffCT Feb 2017 #6
Old and Cranky here too! tech3149 Feb 2017 #41
I hear this from many people, that the democratic party needs to be revitalized and back to a RKP5637 Feb 2017 #2
Agree Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2017 #31
No. More. Septuagenarians. randome Feb 2017 #3
The GOP is actually in a better position crazycatlady Feb 2017 #48
Maybe the best thing we have going for us, then, is that the GOP is still entrenched in status quo. randome Feb 2017 #65
I'm getting close to that age, and I agree Retrograde Feb 2017 #81
I'm getting up to that old & creaky age NewJeffCT Feb 2017 #4
Martin O'Malley is 54. n/t FSogol Feb 2017 #24
I was impressed by O'Malley NewJeffCT Feb 2017 #29
If you believe what Hogan and Michael Steele said. He left due to term limits. Without them, he'd FSogol Feb 2017 #42
I was an O'Malley supporter and so impressed with his command of issues. KittyWampus Feb 2017 #66
Sally Yates? CurtEastPoint Feb 2017 #28
registered Republican NewJeffCT Feb 2017 #32
I saw that, too. I wonder if she could be won over. I mean, she seems NORMAL! CurtEastPoint Feb 2017 #35
Yep - the next Generation JustAnotherGen Feb 2017 #60
I like what I have seen so far from Buttigieg. LonePirate Feb 2017 #5
The House Democratic Leader is a 76 year old $100 millionaire Renew Deal Feb 2017 #7
Amen. truebluegreen Feb 2017 #37
The 76-year-old House Democratic Leader has institutional memory. GoCubsGo Feb 2017 #69
I think age plays a part in this but not as Dean is suggesting... Docreed2003 Feb 2017 #8
A lot of younger voters do not want to belong to a political party alarimer Feb 2017 #56
No. johnp3907 Feb 2017 #9
At 72, we realize that younger people are needed to take us into the future. SharonAnn Feb 2017 #10
Well said!!! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2017 #22
I've watched Pete in real time as a Michigan neighbor of South Bend. erinlough Feb 2017 #59
Both Howard Dean and Martin O'Malley back Buttigieg. JaneQPublic Feb 2017 #11
Who does get a vote in the matter...and when? CousinIT Feb 2017 #13
447 DNC members, on 23-26 Feb 2017. JaneQPublic Feb 2017 #20
Tx. CousinIT Feb 2017 #21
I Like Him Too Me. Feb 2017 #27
YES! Chasstev365 Feb 2017 #12
Yep, the writing was on the wall and whether we like it or not, tRump saw it and exploited it. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2017 #23
Howard has been calling for "younger blood" in our leadership since Obama was inaugurated DFW Feb 2017 #14
Whoever gets the nomination better get ALL of our support world wide wally Feb 2017 #15
You are correct. n/t FSogol Feb 2017 #25
Yea. 1000000 x that. n/t CousinIT Feb 2017 #30
Howard Dean is right. PatsFan87 Feb 2017 #16
maybe but ellison and perez are Obama generation JI7 Feb 2017 #17
Thank you. Cha Feb 2017 #19
Martin O'Malley endorsed Pete Buttigieg also. Here's what he said: FSogol Feb 2017 #18
Canada has Justin Trudeau greymattermom Feb 2017 #26
Ellison is not the person for the job. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #33
Excellent points, esp Pete the non-Hillary/Non-Bernie candidate (nt) JaneQPublic Feb 2017 #44
Thanks. Time to end the proxy primary fight for the DNC chair. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #54
I like Buttigieg and would be fine with him (though I would rather have Ellison). Goblinmonger Feb 2017 #82
"old and creaky" is an understatement. Scruffy1 Feb 2017 #34
Maybe the problem is too many people just watching? Maybe new union leadership is also needed delisen Feb 2017 #62
It should be Dean as DNC chair, honestly NoGoodNamesLeft Feb 2017 #36
He's a lobbyist now. Is that the right look? truebluegreen Feb 2017 #38
Not actually a lobbyist. JaneQPublic Feb 2017 #46
That's all good then. truebluegreen Feb 2017 #53
Yes. He's right about Dem leadership. truebluegreen Feb 2017 #39
Age is a number. It's the mindset that matters. Cases in point: Liz and Bernie Blaukraut Feb 2017 #40
We had an inspiration Plucketeer Feb 2017 #43
What is all of that about? George II Feb 2017 #63
I have to call on Tom Perez as DNC Chair.. Cha Feb 2017 #73
For someone who won't even register as a Democrat, what does that say, and then brings in people still_one Feb 2017 #74
"what does that say" Plucketeer Feb 2017 #77
How DID the DNC's efforts shine for '16 Plucketeer Feb 2017 #78
Let's see. In Michigan Hillary lost by .3%. Jill Stein received 1.1% of the vote there still_one Feb 2017 #79
"self-identified progressives" Plucketeer Feb 2017 #80
anyone who didn't vote for Hillary knowing what was at stake is either NOT a progressive still_one Feb 2017 #83
Yes. toddwv Feb 2017 #45
Just. Get. On. With. It. BannonsLiver Feb 2017 #47
We defiantly need to get back to a 50 state strategy TNLib Feb 2017 #49
Absolutely. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #55
Absolutely RIGHT that! n/t CousinIT Feb 2017 #71
DNC Chair Debate tonight on CNN at 10 p.m. ET JaneQPublic Feb 2017 #50
Oh! Thanks! n/t CousinIT Feb 2017 #61
Am surprised Dean isn't supporting Perez flamingdem Feb 2017 #51
Maybe we should grade them on performance? randr Feb 2017 #52
He has a point... Wounded Bear Feb 2017 #57
Agreed! Phoenix61 Feb 2017 #58
Too much scapegoating; to much ageism. nt delisen Feb 2017 #64
Yes. This. GoCubsGo Feb 2017 #70
I think geography is more of an obstacle than age hollowdweller Feb 2017 #67
I think this is true. Willie Pep Feb 2017 #75
Get off of my lawn!!!!!!!!!!! nt Blue_true Feb 2017 #68
May be? kentuck Feb 2017 #72
Make new friends but keep the old Sucha NastyWoman Feb 2017 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Howard Dean right? "De...»Reply #18