Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rand Paul: Just because a couple people on the SupremeCourt declare something to be 'constitutional' [View all]Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)28. Jack Conway was highly qualified to be a Senator.
He consistently held higher approval numbers over Rand "Dred Scott" Paul, yet he lost because the southern state wanted to vote against Obama at all costs.
Sad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rand Paul: Just because a couple people on the SupremeCourt declare something to be 'constitutional' [View all]
highplainsdem
Jun 2012
OP
Wow. Actually it was 5 on the SC and it does make in constitutional, as long as the opinion is
morningfog
Jun 2012
#47